SF
Price
$115.02
Change
-$1.21 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.95B
91 days until earnings call
TIGR
Price
$6.52
Change
+$0.07 (+1.09%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
533.37M
63 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SF vs TIGR

Header iconSF vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts SF vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Stifel Financial
Price$115.02
Change-$1.21 (-1.04%)
Volume$2.75K
Capitalization7.95B
UP Fintech Holding
Price$6.52
Change+$0.07 (+1.09%)
Volume$27.84K
Capitalization533.37M
SF vs TIGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SF vs. TIGR commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SF is a Hold and TIGR is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (SF: $116.23 vs. TIGR: $6.45)
Brand notoriety: SF and TIGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SF: 101% vs. TIGR: 106%
Market capitalization -- SF: $7.95B vs. TIGR: $533.37M
SF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.95B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $533.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than TIGR.

Price Growth

SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.27% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.55% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($7.95B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($533M). SF has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: SF (18.06) vs TIGR (15.40). SF YTD gains are higher at: 9.568 vs. TIGR (-0.155). TIGR has less debt than SF: TIGR (166M) vs SF (1.18B). SF has higher revenues than TIGR: SF (4.29B) vs TIGR (252M).
SFTIGRSF / TIGR
Capitalization7.95B533M1,491%
EBITDAN/A69.1M-
Gain YTD9.568-0.155-6,181%
P/E Ratio18.0615.40117%
Revenue4.29B252M1,703%
Total CashN/A678M-
Total Debt1.18B166M708%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF vs TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
SF
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2775
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
788
SMR RATING
1..100
1081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIGR's Valuation (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (81). This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (88). This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (81). This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TIGR (40). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (35). This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+2.06%
PIPR - SF
80%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
GS - SF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
EVR - SF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
RJF - SF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
MS - SF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
-4.73%
FUTU - TIGR
57%
Loosely correlated
+4.34%
HKXCY - TIGR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
HKXCF - TIGR
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SF - TIGR
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
RIOT - TIGR
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.85%
More