SEUSF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.07 (-17.95%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
163.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WOPEF
Price
$15.00
Change
-$0.03 (-0.20%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
33.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEUSF vs WOPEF

Header iconSEUSF vs WOPEF Comparison
Open Charts SEUSF vs WOPEFBanner chart's image
Sintana Energy
Price$0.32
Change-$0.07 (-17.95%)
Volume$64K
Capitalization163.28M
Woodside Energy Group
Price$15.00
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
Volume$407
Capitalization33.13B
SEUSF vs WOPEF Comparison Chart in %
SEUSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WOPEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEUSF vs. WOPEF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEUSF is a Hold and WOPEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (SEUSF: $0.32 vs. WOPEF: $16.35)
Brand notoriety: SEUSF and WOPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEUSF: 18% vs. WOPEF: 0%
Market capitalization -- SEUSF: $163.28M vs. WOPEF: $33.13B
SEUSF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $163.28M. WOPEF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $33.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $129.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEUSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWOPEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SEUSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WOPEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WOPEF is a better buy in the long-term than SEUSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEUSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOPEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SEUSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WOPEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WOPEF is a better buy in the short-term than SEUSF.

Price Growth

SEUSF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.83% price change this week, while WOPEF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WOPEF($33.1B) has a higher market cap than SEUSF($163M). SEUSF has higher P/E ratio than WOPEF: SEUSF (193.05) vs WOPEF (10.60). WOPEF YTD gains are higher at: 2.843 vs. SEUSF (-4.912). WOPEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.55B vs. SEUSF (-13.75M). WOPEF has more cash in the bank: 5.15B vs. SEUSF (14.5M). WOPEF has higher revenues than SEUSF: WOPEF (13.8B) vs SEUSF (0).
SEUSFWOPEFSEUSF / WOPEF
Capitalization163M33.1B0%
EBITDA-13.75M9.55B-0%
Gain YTD-4.9122.843-173%
P/E Ratio193.0510.601,822%
Revenue013.8B-
Total Cash14.5M5.15B0%
Total DebtN/A13.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEUSF vs WOPEF: Fundamental Ratings
SEUSF
WOPEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6786
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7787
SMR RATING
1..100
9794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
283
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8528

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WOPEF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEUSF (97). This means that WOPEF’s stock grew significantly faster than SEUSF’s over the last 12 months.

SEUSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as WOPEF (87). This means that SEUSF’s stock grew similarly to WOPEF’s over the last 12 months.

WOPEF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SEUSF (97). This means that WOPEF’s stock grew similarly to SEUSF’s over the last 12 months.

WOPEF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SEUSF (80). This means that WOPEF’s stock grew similarly to SEUSF’s over the last 12 months.

SEUSF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WOPEF (83). This means that SEUSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WOPEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEUSFWOPEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SEUSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WOPEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRDE16500.00N/A
N/A
Cardinal Ethanol LLC
KUNUF0.98N/A
N/A
Kunlun Energy Co., Ltd.
PORBF8.70N/A
N/A
Pola Orbis Holdings Inc
CFRUY19.41-0.28
-1.40%
Compagnie Financiere Richemont AG
CHHYF0.08-0.01
-15.31%
Charbone Hydrogen Corporation

SEUSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEUSF and GASXF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEUSF and GASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEUSF
1D Price
Change %
SEUSF100%
-1.91%
GASXF - SEUSF
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
GPOR - SEUSF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
YGRAF - SEUSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
WOPEF - SEUSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNEGF - SEUSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WOPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOPEF has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOPEF jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WOPEF
1D Price
Change %
WOPEF100%
N/A
WDS - WOPEF
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
SSLZY - WOPEF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
SOUTF - WOPEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNRG - WOPEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
PED - WOPEF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More