SEUSF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.02 (-3.77%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
70.22M
WLTNF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.14 (-21.54%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
35.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEUSF vs WLTNF

Header iconSEUSF vs WLTNF Comparison
Open Charts SEUSF vs WLTNFBanner chart's image
Sintana Energy
Price$0.51
Change-$0.02 (-3.77%)
Volume$128.63K
Capitalization70.22M
Wilton Res
Price$0.51
Change-$0.14 (-21.54%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization35.21M
SEUSF vs WLTNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SEUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLTNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEUSF vs. WLTNF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEUSF is a Hold and WLTNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SEUSF: $0.51 vs. WLTNF: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: SEUSF and WLTNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEUSF: 121% vs. WLTNF: 46%
Market capitalization -- SEUSF: $70.22M vs. WLTNF: $35.21M
SEUSF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $70.22M. WLTNF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $35.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEUSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLTNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SEUSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLTNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEUSF is a better buy in the long-term than WLTNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEUSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLTNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SEUSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WLTNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SEUSF and WLTNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SEUSF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while WLTNF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.44% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEUSF($70.2M) has a higher market cap than WLTNF($35.2M). WLTNF YTD gains are higher at: 3.198 vs. SEUSF (-37.423). SEUSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 642K vs. WLTNF (-1.71M). SEUSF has more cash in the bank: 5.18M vs. WLTNF (180K). SEUSF has less debt than WLTNF: SEUSF (115K) vs WLTNF (968K). WLTNF has higher revenues than SEUSF: WLTNF (13.3K) vs SEUSF (0).
SEUSFWLTNFSEUSF / WLTNF
Capitalization70.2M35.2M199%
EBITDA642K-1.71M-37%
Gain YTD-37.4233.198-1,170%
P/E Ratio27.93N/A-
Revenue013.3K-
Total Cash5.18M180K2,878%
Total Debt115K968K12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEUSF vs WLTNF: Fundamental Ratings
SEUSF
WLTNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5861
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SEUSF's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as WLTNF (100). This means that SEUSF’s stock grew similarly to WLTNF’s over the last 12 months.

SEUSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as WLTNF (61). This means that SEUSF’s stock grew similarly to WLTNF’s over the last 12 months.

SEUSF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as WLTNF (100). This means that SEUSF’s stock grew similarly to WLTNF’s over the last 12 months.

SEUSF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as WLTNF (55). This means that SEUSF’s stock grew similarly to WLTNF’s over the last 12 months.

SEUSF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLTNF (100). This means that SEUSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLTNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEUSFWLTNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SEUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLTNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUFRY5.510.02
+0.27%
AVOLTA AG
BYDDF15.630.03
+0.20%
BYD Co Ltd
AITUF7.80N/A
N/A
Anritsu Corp.
EMYB16.14N/A
N/A
Embassy Bancorp Inc.
XXMMF0.09N/A
N/A
XIMEN MINING CORP

SEUSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEUSF and KGEI have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEUSF and KGEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEUSF
1D Price
Change %
SEUSF100%
-3.20%
KGEI - SEUSF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
AAVVF - SEUSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
YGRAF - SEUSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VVCVF - SEUSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLTNF - SEUSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLTNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLTNF has been loosely correlated with BLMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLTNF jumps, then BLMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLTNF
1D Price
Change %
WLTNF100%
N/A
BLMC - WLTNF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
COPJF - WLTNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUWOY - WLTNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+5.35%
YGRAF - WLTNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNRG - WLTNF
5%
Poorly correlated
+11.38%
More