SEOJF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
6.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WBNEF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
5.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEOJF vs WBNEF

Header iconSEOJF vs WBNEF Comparison
Open Charts SEOJF vs WBNEFBanner chart's image
Stora Enso Oyj
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$164
Capitalization6.75B
Westbond Enterprises
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization5.46M
SEOJF vs WBNEF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEOJF vs. WBNEF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEOJF is a Hold and WBNEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (SEOJF: $8.56 vs. WBNEF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: SEOJF and WBNEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEOJF: 100% vs. WBNEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SEOJF: $6.75B vs. WBNEF: $5.46M
SEOJF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $6.75B. WBNEF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $5.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEOJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWBNEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SEOJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WBNEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SEOJF and WBNEF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

SEOJF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WBNEF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.67% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEOJF($6.75B) has a higher market cap than WBNEF($5.46M). WBNEF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SEOJF (-12.205). SEOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 588M vs. WBNEF (1.18M). SEOJF has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. WBNEF (51.9K). WBNEF has less debt than SEOJF: WBNEF (1.88M) vs SEOJF (5.68B). SEOJF has higher revenues than WBNEF: SEOJF (9.37B) vs WBNEF (9.05M).
SEOJFWBNEFSEOJF / WBNEF
Capitalization6.75B5.46M123,554%
EBITDA588M1.18M49,704%
Gain YTD-12.2050.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue9.37B9.05M103,604%
Total Cash1.57B51.9K3,025,048%
Total Debt5.68B1.88M302,073%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEOJF: Fundamental Ratings
SEOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEOJFWBNEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXI93.191.35
+1.47%
iShares Global Materials ETF
SEIM46.300.27
+0.59%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momt Fac ETF
CNYGBP0.11N/A
N/A
China Yuan - United Kingdom Pound
CADCNY5.08N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - China Yuan
HYRM23.44-0.03
-0.12%
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD HY Strat ETF

SEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOJF and HLMMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOJF and HLMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOJF
1D Price
Change %
SEOJF100%
N/A
HLMMF - SEOJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
UPMKF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBNEF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAGN - SEOJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.07%
More

WBNEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBNEF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBNEF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBNEF
1D Price
Change %
WBNEF100%
N/A
SEOJF - WBNEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVM - WBNEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
HLMMF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
NIJPF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More