SEOFF
Price
$11.05
Change
+$1.54 (+16.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.71B
UPMKF
Price
$28.63
Change
-$0.83 (-2.82%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEOFF vs UPMKF

Header iconSEOFF vs UPMKF Comparison
Open Charts SEOFF vs UPMKFBanner chart's image
Stora Enso Oyj
Price$11.05
Change+$1.54 (+16.19%)
Volume$300
Capitalization8.71B
UPM-Kymmene
Price$28.63
Change-$0.83 (-2.82%)
Volume$556
Capitalization14.88B
SEOFF vs UPMKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UPMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEOFF vs. UPMKF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEOFF is a Hold and UPMKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SEOFF: $11.05 vs. UPMKF: $28.63)
Brand notoriety: SEOFF and UPMKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEOFF: 57% vs. UPMKF: 5%
Market capitalization -- SEOFF: $8.71B vs. UPMKF: $14.88B
SEOFF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $8.71B. UPMKF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $14.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEOFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SEOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPMKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPMKF is a better buy in the long-term than SEOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UPMKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UPMKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

SEOFF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UPMKF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-0.93% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPMKF($14.9B) has a higher market cap than SEOFF($8.71B). UPMKF YTD gains are higher at: 7.540 vs. SEOFF (-5.556). UPMKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.6B vs. SEOFF (588M). SEOFF has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. UPMKF (740M). UPMKF has less debt than SEOFF: UPMKF (4.07B) vs SEOFF (5.68B). UPMKF has higher revenues than SEOFF: UPMKF (10.2B) vs SEOFF (9.37B).
SEOFFUPMKFSEOFF / UPMKF
Capitalization8.71B14.9B58%
EBITDA588M1.6B37%
Gain YTD-5.5567.540-74%
P/E RatioN/A37.60-
Revenue9.37B10.2B92%
Total Cash1.57B740M212%
Total Debt5.68B4.07B140%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UPMKF: Fundamental Ratings
UPMKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEOFFUPMKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UPMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIFI44.010.08
+0.19%
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
HKND33.15N/A
N/A
Humankind US Stock ETF
LIAX247.14N/A
N/A
LifeX 2063 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
SPHY23.69-0.01
-0.04%
SPDR® Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
TUA21.83-0.04
-0.18%
Simplify Short Term Trsy Futs Strat ETF

SEOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOFF and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOFF and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOFF
1D Price
Change %
SEOFF100%
N/A
SLVM - SEOFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
HLMMF - SEOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIJPF - SEOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - SEOFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - SEOFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPMKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPMKF and SEOAY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPMKF and SEOAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPMKF
1D Price
Change %
UPMKF100%
N/A
SEOAY - UPMKF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
UPMMY - UPMKF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
SLVM - UPMKF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
HLMMF - UPMKF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OJIPF - UPMKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More