SEOFF
Price
$11.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 5 closing price
SLVM
Price
$84.23
Change
+$2.86 (+3.51%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SEOFF vs SLVM

Header iconSEOFF vs SLVM Comparison
Open Charts SEOFF vs SLVMBanner chart's image
Stora Enso Oyj
Price$11.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Sylvamo
Price$84.23
Change+$2.86 (+3.51%)
Volume$479.7K
CapitalizationN/A
SEOFF vs SLVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEOFF vs. SLVM commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEOFF is a Hold and SLVM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (SEOFF: $11.70 vs. SLVM: $84.23)
Brand notoriety: SEOFF and SLVM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEOFF: 100% vs. SLVM: 148%
Market capitalization -- SEOFF: $8.06B vs. SLVM: $2.54B
SEOFF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $8.06B. SLVM’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $2.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEOFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SEOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the long-term than SEOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SEOFF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -9.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-3.02% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEOFF($8.06B) has a higher market cap than SLVM($2.55B). SEOFF has higher P/E ratio than SLVM: SEOFF (27.40) vs SLVM (10.39). SLVM YTD gains are higher at: 75.559 vs. SEOFF (-9.302). SEOFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. SLVM (572M). SEOFF has more cash in the bank: 1.97B vs. SLVM (220M). SLVM has less debt than SEOFF: SLVM (959M) vs SEOFF (5.13B). SEOFF has higher revenues than SLVM: SEOFF (10.9B) vs SLVM (3.72B).
SEOFFSLVMSEOFF / SLVM
Capitalization8.06B2.55B317%
EBITDA1.96B572M343%
Gain YTD-9.30275.559-12%
P/E Ratio27.4010.39264%
Revenue10.9B3.72B293%
Total Cash1.97B220M897%
Total Debt5.13B959M535%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

SEOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOFF and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOFF and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOFF
1D Price
Change %
SEOFF100%
N/A
SLVM - SEOFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.51%
HLMMF - SEOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIJPF - SEOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - SEOFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - SEOFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
More

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVM and MERC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVM and MERC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
+3.51%
MERC - SLVM
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
CLW - SLVM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
MONDY - SLVM
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
SUZ - SLVM
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
UPMKF - SLVM
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
More