Advertisement
SEOAY vs SLVM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEOAY is a Hold and SLVM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SEOAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SEOAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SEOAY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SEOAY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SLVM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SEOAY (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -7.66% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -5.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.34%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
SEOAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
SLVM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (+0.02% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
@Pulp & Paper (-1.25% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| SEOAY | SLVM | SEOAY / SLVM | |
| Capitalization | 9.18B | 1.89B | 486% |
| EBITDA | 670M | 473M | 142% |
| Gain YTD | -7.069 | 0.343 | -2,062% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 11.03 | - |
| Revenue | 9.39B | 3.43B | 274% |
| Total Cash | 2.23B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.54B | 808M | 686% |
SEOAY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SEOAY | SLVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 14 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 7 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADFI | 8.56 | -0.01 | -0.12% |
| Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | |||
| NOCT | 58.15 | -0.29 | -0.50% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct | |||
| EOS | 22.17 | -0.40 | -1.77% |
| Eaton Vance Enhance Equity Income Fund II | |||
| BULX | 5.06 | -0.20 | -3.83% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long BULL Daily ETF | |||
| TEMT | 9.86 | -0.93 | -8.62% |
| Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF | |||
SEOAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEOAY has been closely correlated with UPMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEOAY jumps, then UPMMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEOAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEOAY | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| UPMMY - SEOAY | 70% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| MONDY - SEOAY | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| MERC - SEOAY | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.67% | ||
| UPMKF - SEOAY | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SLVM - SEOAY | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||
SLVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVM | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| CLW - SLVM | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.97% | ||
| MAGN - SLVM | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| MERC - SLVM | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.67% | ||
| MATV - SLVM | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.87% | ||
| SEOAY - SLVM | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||