Advertisement
SEMHF vs SERA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEMHF is a Hold and SERA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SEMHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSERA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SEMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SERA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SEMHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SERA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SEMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SERA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SEMHF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while SERA (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +3.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
SERA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.02% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| SEMHF | SERA | SEMHF / SERA | |
| Capitalization | 61.8B | 127M | 48,661% |
| EBITDA | 4.68B | -31.85M | -14,704% |
| Gain YTD | 5.431 | -58.968 | -9% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.79 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 23.4B | 108K | 21,666,667% |
| Total Cash | 2.77B | 40.2M | 6,898% |
| Total Debt | 735M | 351K | 209,402% |
SEMHF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SEMHF | SERA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
SEMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SEMHF and ECIA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEMHF and ECIA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEMHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ECIA - SEMHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -13.33% | ||
| SSKN - SEMHF | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.71% | ||
| SERA - SEMHF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
| OSSUY - SEMHF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MRCHF - SEMHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.57% | ||
More | ||||
SERA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SERA has been loosely correlated with CNVVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SERA jumps, then CNVVF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SERA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERA | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| CNVVF - SERA | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| UTMD - SERA | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| AMIX - SERA | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.76% | ||
| HBIO - SERA | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| RVTY - SERA | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||