Advertisement
SECCF vs TLPFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SECCF is a Hold and TLPFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SECCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTLPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SECCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TLPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SECCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLPFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SECCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TLPFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
SECCF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -3.04% price change this week, while TLPFF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -2.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.13%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.63% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| SECCF | TLPFF | SECCF / TLPFF | |
| Capitalization | 3.07B | 4.37B | 70% |
| EBITDA | 346M | 1.86B | 19% |
| Gain YTD | 56.736 | -13.932 | -407% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.80 | 7.72 | 580% |
| Revenue | 4.85B | 10.3B | 47% |
| Total Cash | 174M | 1.34B | 13% |
| Total Debt | 957M | 5.62B | 17% |
SECCF | TLPFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLPFF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SECCF (34). This means that TLPFF’s stock grew similarly to SECCF’s over the last 12 months.
SECCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLPFF (100). This means that SECCF’s stock grew significantly faster than TLPFF’s over the last 12 months.
SECCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as TLPFF (95). This means that SECCF’s stock grew similarly to TLPFF’s over the last 12 months.
SECCF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLPFF (87). This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLPFF’s over the last 12 months.
SECCF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLPFF (65). This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLPFF’s over the last 12 months.
| SECCF | TLPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 26% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 26% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
SECCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SECCF and FC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECCF and FC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SECCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SECCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FC - SECCF | 20% Poorly correlated | +5.71% | ||
| SPIR - SECCF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| TLPFF - SECCF | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| RLXXF - SECCF | 10% Poorly correlated | +4.99% | ||
| SOMLY - SECCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
TLPFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TLPFF and TLPFY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLPFF and TLPFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLPFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLPFF | 100% | -2.41% | ||
| TLPFY - TLPFF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| SOMLY - TLPFF | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| SECCF - TLPFF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VMTG - TLPFF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGSOF - TLPFF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||