Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCWFX vs TEMGX
SCWFX vs TEMGX Comparison
Open Charts SCWFX vs TEMGX
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$73.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
Templeton Global Smaller Comp A
Price$9.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets810.84M
SCWFX vs TEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCWFX vs. TEMGX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCWFX is a Hold and TEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. TEMGX (811M). TEMGX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: TEMGX (1.04) vs SCWFX (0.53). SCWFX was incepted earlier than TEMGX: SCWFX (25 years) vs TEMGX (44 years). TEMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TEMGX (11.95). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMGX: SCWFX (250) vs TEMGX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. TEMGX (-3.28). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.01 vs. TEMGX (13.49).
| SCWFX | TEMGX | SCWFX / TEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.31 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.660 | 5.090 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 811M | 9,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.04 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | -3.28 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.26 | 37.46 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.01 | 13.49 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.71 | 31.06 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement