Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCVFX vs SSGSX
SCVFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SCVFX vs SSGSX
Allspring Small Company Value C
Price$30.17
Change+$0.21 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets605.96M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
SCVFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCVFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCVFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. SCVFX (606M). SSGSX (0.51) and SCVFX (0.50) have matching dividends . SCVFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SCVFX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SCVFX (2.05) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SCVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SCVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: SCVFX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. SCVFX (-1.67). SCVFX return over 5 years is better than : 63.48 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| SCVFX | SSGSX | SCVFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.26 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.26 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.462 | -2.068 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 606M | 5.82B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.51 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -1.26 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.55 | 2.38 | 444% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.48 | 29.33 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.80 | 16.52 | 344% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement