Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCICX vs WSTAX
SCICX vs WSTAX Comparison
Open Charts SCICX vs WSTAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$52.08
Change-$0.60 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.62B
Macquarie Science and Technology A
Price$62.33
Change-$0.35 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.37B
SCICX vs WSTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCICX vs. WSTAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCICX is a Buy and WSTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. WSTAX (6.37B). SCICX (0.00) and WSTAX (0.00) have matching dividends . SCICX was incepted earlier than WSTAX: SCICX (26 years) vs WSTAX (25 years). SCICX (1.93) is less costly to investors than WSTAX (1.16). WSTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SCICX (39.00). WSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: WSTAX (1000) vs SCICX (2000). WSTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.43 vs. SCICX (-7.84). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : -5.07 vs. WSTAX (-24.02).
| SCICX | WSTAX | SCICX / WSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.16 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.16 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.439 | 21.643 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.6B | 6.37B | 245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.84 | 9.43 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.20 | 8.51 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.07 | -24.02 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.04 | 16.42 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers