Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCICX vs STPAX
SCICX vs STPAX Comparison
Open Charts SCICX vs STPAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$48.57
Change+$0.69 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.61B
Saratoga Technology & Comm A
Price$22.59
Change+$0.32 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.81M
SCICX vs STPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCICX vs. STPAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCICX is a Buy and STPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. STPAX (42.8M). SCICX (0.00) and STPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . SCICX was incepted earlier than STPAX: SCICX (26 years) vs STPAX (28 years). STPAX (2.62) is less costly to investors than SCICX (1.93). SCICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. STPAX (8.00). SCICX has a lower initial minimum investment than STPAX: SCICX (2000) vs STPAX (2500). STPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.35 vs. SCICX (-16.83). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : -5.80 vs. STPAX (-10.96).
| SCICX | STPAX | SCICX / STPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.62 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.62 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.794 | 8.710 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6B | 42.8M | 34,112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.83 | -1.35 | 1,243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.90 | 20.42 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.80 | -10.96 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.59 | 38.93 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement