Advertisement
SCIA vs SLOIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCIA is a Hold and SLOIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCIA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLOIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SCIA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLOIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SCIA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLOIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SCIA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SLOIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SCIA (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while SLOIF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -12.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.86%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.96% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| SCIA | SLOIF | SCIA / SLOIF | |
| Capitalization | 17.4M | 1.58B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 1.93M | 278M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -17.391 | -53.340 | 33% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.88 | 14.24 | 83% |
| Revenue | 16M | 891M | 2% |
| Total Cash | 7.97M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.15M | N/A | - |
SCIA | SLOIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCIA's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (54). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
SCIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLOIF (100). This means that SCIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
SCIA's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (85). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
SCIA's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (90). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
SCIA's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLOIF (92). This means that SCIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
| SCIA | SLOIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
SCIA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCIA and PRSO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCIA and PRSO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCIA | 100% | -6.17% | ||
| PRSO - SCIA | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| RNWEF - SCIA | 12% Poorly correlated | +10.53% | ||
| SILXF - SCIA | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| SLOIF - SCIA | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROHCY - SCIA | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||
SLOIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLOIF and TOELF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLOIF and TOELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLOIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLOIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOELF - SLOIF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| SCIA - SLOIF | 8% Poorly correlated | -6.17% | ||
| ROHCF - SLOIF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROHCY - SLOIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| TOELY - SLOIF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.85% | ||
More | ||||