SCIA
Price
$4.18
Change
+$0.05 (+1.21%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
19.14M
SLOIF
Price
$43.16
Change
+$4.41 (+11.38%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCIA vs SLOIF

Header iconSCIA vs SLOIF Comparison
Open Charts SCIA vs SLOIFBanner chart's image
SCI Engineered Materials
Price$4.18
Change+$0.05 (+1.21%)
Volume$510
Capitalization19.14M
Soitec, Bernin
Price$43.16
Change+$4.41 (+11.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.63B
SCIA vs SLOIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCIA vs. SLOIF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCIA is a Hold and SLOIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SCIA: $4.18 vs. SLOIF: $43.16)
Brand notoriety: SCIA and SLOIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCIA: 17% vs. SLOIF: 54%
Market capitalization -- SCIA: $19.14M vs. SLOIF: $1.63B
SCIA [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $19.14M. SLOIF’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $1.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $374.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $28.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLOIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SCIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLOIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCIA is a better buy in the long-term than SLOIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCIA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLOIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCIA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLOIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCIA is a better buy in the short-term than SLOIF.

Price Growth

SCIA (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.65% price change this week, while SLOIF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +11.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+4.36% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLOIF($1.63B) has a higher market cap than SCIA($19.1M). SLOIF has higher P/E ratio than SCIA: SLOIF (14.38) vs SCIA (13.06). SCIA YTD gains are higher at: -9.130 vs. SLOIF (-52.262). SLOIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 278M vs. SCIA (1.93M). SLOIF has higher revenues than SCIA: SLOIF (891M) vs SCIA (16M).
SCIASLOIFSCIA / SLOIF
Capitalization19.1M1.63B1%
EBITDA1.93M278M1%
Gain YTD-9.130-52.26217%
P/E Ratio13.0614.3891%
Revenue16M891M2%
Total Cash7.97MN/A-
Total Debt1.15MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCIA vs SLOIF: Fundamental Ratings
SCIA
SLOIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8424
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
6685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6065
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCIA's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (54). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLOIF (100). This means that SCIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (85). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (65). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLOIF (84). This means that SCIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCIASLOIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMUEX28.17N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Equity L
ONRDX27.56N/A
N/A
Invesco Rising Dividends R
RSGRX35.37N/A
N/A
Victory RS Growth A
BIBDX13.36N/A
N/A
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
RYSVX216.86N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value A

SCIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCIA and PRSO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCIA and PRSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCIA
1D Price
Change %
SCIA100%
N/A
PRSO - SCIA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
RNWEF - SCIA
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILXF - SCIA
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLOIF - SCIA
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROHCY - SCIA
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLOIF and TOELF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLOIF and TOELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLOIF
1D Price
Change %
SLOIF100%
N/A
TOELF - SLOIF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCIA - SLOIF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROHCF - SLOIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROHCY - SLOIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOELY - SLOIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More