SCHYF
Price
$2.37
Change
-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
30.88B
SKYZF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.03 (-4.92%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHYF vs SKYZF

Header iconSCHYF vs SKYZF Comparison
Open Charts SCHYF vs SKYZFBanner chart's image
Sands China
Price$2.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization30.88B
Sky City Entertainment Group
Price$0.58
Change-$0.03 (-4.92%)
Volume$263
Capitalization1.04B
SCHYF vs SKYZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCHYF vs. SKYZF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHYF is a Hold and SKYZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SCHYF: $2.37 vs. SKYZF: $0.58)
Brand notoriety: SCHYF and SKYZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCHYF: 1% vs. SKYZF: 30%
Market capitalization -- SCHYF: $30.88B vs. SKYZF: $1.04B
SCHYF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $30.88B. SKYZF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $1.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCHYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKYZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKYZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKYZF is a better buy in the long-term than SCHYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCHYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKYZF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SKYZF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKYZF is a better buy in the short-term than SCHYF.

Price Growth

SCHYF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while SKYZF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.03% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($30.9B) has a higher market cap than SKYZF($1.04B). SCHYF YTD gains are higher at: -3.403 vs. SKYZF (-24.167). SKYZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 186M vs. SCHYF (-339M). SCHYF has more cash in the bank: 766M vs. SKYZF (49.9M). SKYZF has less debt than SCHYF: SKYZF (608M) vs SCHYF (8.66B). SCHYF has higher revenues than SKYZF: SCHYF (2.17B) vs SKYZF (614M).
SCHYFSKYZFSCHYF / SKYZF
Capitalization30.9B1.04B2,960%
EBITDA-339M186M-182%
Gain YTD-3.403-24.16714%
P/E RatioN/A74.63-
Revenue2.17B614M353%
Total Cash766M49.9M1,535%
Total Debt8.66B608M1,424%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCHYF vs SKYZF: Fundamental Ratings
SCHYF
SKYZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3988
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a18

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SKYZF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCHYF (67). This means that SKYZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SKYZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (100). This means that SKYZF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SKYZF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (99). This means that SKYZF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SKYZF (88). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SKYZF’s over the last 12 months.

SKYZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCHYF (83). This means that SKYZF’s stock grew significantly faster than SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHYFSKYZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGOYX13.520.11
+0.82%
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Y
DFSTX49.700.30
+0.61%
DFA US Small Cap I
GFVIX16.060.06
+0.37%
Goldman Sachs Focused Value Inv
PEQIX25.530.07
+0.27%
Victory Pioneer Equity Income A
IGFRX24.68-0.08
-0.32%
Invesco EQV International Equity R6

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCHYY - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
SJMHF - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+14.91%
GXYEF - SCHYF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMF - SCHYF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More

SKYZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKYZF has been loosely correlated with MCHVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKYZF jumps, then MCHVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKYZF
1D Price
Change %
SKYZF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SKYZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WYNMF - SKYZF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
TBTC - SKYZF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
SCHYF - SKYZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYTCY - SKYZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More