SCHYF
Price
$2.61
Change
+$0.25 (+10.59%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
20.45B
SJMHF
Price
$0.35
Change
-$0.03 (-7.89%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHYF vs SJMHF

Header iconSCHYF vs SJMHF Comparison
Open Charts SCHYF vs SJMHFBanner chart's image
Sands China
Price$2.61
Change+$0.25 (+10.59%)
Volume$372
Capitalization20.45B
SJM Holdings
Price$0.35
Change-$0.03 (-7.89%)
Volume$4.17K
Capitalization2.69B
SCHYF vs SJMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCHYF vs. SJMHF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHYF is a Hold and SJMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SCHYF: $2.61 vs. SJMHF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: SCHYF and SJMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCHYF: 16% vs. SJMHF: 290%
Market capitalization -- SCHYF: $20.45B vs. SJMHF: $2.69B
SCHYF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $20.45B. SJMHF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCHYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the long-term than SJMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCHYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SJMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the short-term than SCHYF.

Price Growth

SCHYF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -18.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.63% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than SJMHF($2.7B). SJMHF has higher P/E ratio than SCHYF: SJMHF (8460.39) vs SCHYF (23.06). SJMHF YTD gains are higher at: 7.819 vs. SCHYF (6.379).
SCHYFSJMHFSCHYF / SJMHF
Capitalization20.4B2.7B757%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.3797.81982%
P/E Ratio23.068460.390%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCHYF vs SJMHF: Fundamental Ratings
SCHYF
SJMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1217
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
508

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHYF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SJMHF (99). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (99). This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (52). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (17). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHYFSJMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POET5.280.03
+0.48%
POET Technologies
TISI19.23-0.02
-0.10%
Team
BUSE24.68-0.09
-0.36%
First Busey Corp
ALLY41.36-0.21
-0.51%
Ally Financial
MNDR0.80-0.15
-16.23%
Mobile-health Network Solutions

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCHYY - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
SJMHF - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - SCHYF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMF - SCHYF
16%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
More

SJMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHF
1D Price
Change %
SJMHF100%
N/A
SJMHY - SJMHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYY - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
GXYYY - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
CPHC - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
SCHYF - SJMHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More