Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHM vs XMLV
SCHM vs XMLV Comparison
Open Charts SCHM vs XMLV
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$32.01
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.68M
Net Assets13.09B
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Price$64.99
Change+$0.69 (+1.07%)
Volume$132.1K
Net Assets763.68M
SCHM vs XMLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHM vs. XMLV commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHM is a StrongBuy and XMLV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 13.1B vs. XMLV (764M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than XMLV: SCHM (6.452) vs XMLV (4.198). SCHM was incepted earlier than XMLV: SCHM (15 years) vs XMLV (13 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than XMLV (0.25). XMLV has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| SCHM | XMLV | SCHM / XMLV | |
| Gain YTD | 6.452 | 4.198 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 764M | 1,715% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.25 | 16% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 58.00 | 29% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 2.80 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 14 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +5.28% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -7.18% | ||
More | ||||
XMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMLV has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMLV jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMLV | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| GGG - XMLV | 79% Closely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| STAG - XMLV | 78% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| IRT - XMLV | 77% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| FNB - XMLV | 74% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| FR - XMLV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||