Ad is loading...
SCHG vs TMFC
SCHG vs TMFC Comparison
Open Charts SCHG vs TMFC
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.01
Change-$0.72 (-2.51%)
Volume$11.07M
Net Assets38.71B
Motley Fool 100 ETF
Price$60.61
Change-$1.25 (-2.02%)
Volume$108.02K
Net Assets1.29B
SCHG vs TMFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHG vs. TMFC commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Hold and TMFC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 38.7B vs. TMFC (1.29B). TMFC has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: TMFC (0.815) vs SCHG (0.502). SCHG was incepted earlier than TMFC: SCHG (15 years) vs TMFC (7 years). SCHG has a higher turnover TMFC (6.00) vs TMFC (6.00).
| SCHG | TMFC | SCHG / TMFC | |
| Gain YTD | 0.502 | 0.815 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 38.7B | 1.29B | 2,991% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 6.00 | 150% |
| Yield | 0.43 | 0.23 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHG | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -2.51% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 71% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| AVGO - SCHG | 69% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
More | ||||
TMFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFC has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFC jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFC | 100% | -2.02% | ||
| MSFT - TMFC | 75% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMZN - TMFC | 70% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| META - TMFC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| SNPS - TMFC | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| AVGO - TMFC | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.56% | ||
More | ||||