Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHG vs SPUS
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts SCHG vs SPUS
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.14
Change-$0.16 (-0.53%)
Volume$10.56K
Net Assets46.23B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$46.42
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
Volume$441.41K
Net Assets1.52B
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHG vs. SPUS commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Buy and SPUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 46.2B vs. SPUS (1.52B). SCHG (8.938) and SPUS (8.598) have matching annual dividend yield . SCHG was incepted earlier than SPUS: SCHG (16 years) vs SPUS (6 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| SCHG | SPUS | SCHG / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.938 | 8.598 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 46.2B | 1.52B | 3,047% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.45 | 9% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 18.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.39 | 0.68 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHG | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| META - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| APH - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| MSFT - SPUS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| KEYS - SPUS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| CDNS - SPUS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||