Advertisement
SCHD vs TROW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHD is a Hold and TROW is a Hold.
TROW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SCHD | TROW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 8 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 15 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFSD | 48.46 | 0.07 | +0.14% |
| Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Inc ETF | |||
| RFFC | 64.06 | 0.06 | +0.09% |
| ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | |||
| EDGF | 24.94 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | |||
| DFCA | 50.05 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Dimensional California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| PFO | 9.73 | -0.01 | -0.10% |
| Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund | |||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| FITB - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| USB - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| TROW - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| RF - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| HBAN - SCHD | 72% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
More | ||||
TROW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TROW has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TROW jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TROW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TROW | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| APAM - TROW | 79% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| SEIC - TROW | 77% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| JHG - TROW | 75% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| BEN - TROW | 73% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PFG - TROW | 73% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||