Advertisement
SCHD vs TROW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHD is a StrongBuy and TROW is a Hold.
TROW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SCHD | TROW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 19 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSMR | 32.34 | 0.25 | +0.77% |
| McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | |||
| GGUS | 60.26 | 0.40 | +0.67% |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpGrEqETF | |||
| VIOO | 102.78 | 0.22 | +0.21% |
| Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | |||
| GRN | 28.47 | N/A | N/A |
| iPath® Series B Carbon ETN | |||
| ABOT | 38.24 | -0.31 | -0.81% |
| Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF | |||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| TROW - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| FITB - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| USB - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| APAM - SCHD | 75% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| RF - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||
TROW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TROW has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TROW jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TROW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TROW | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| APAM - TROW | 80% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| SEIC - TROW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| PFG - TROW | 77% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| BN - TROW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| JHG - TROW | 76% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||