Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHA vs XSHQ
SCHA vs XSHQ Comparison
Open Charts SCHA vs XSHQ
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$26.50
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
Volume$2.67M
Net Assets18.02B
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Price$42.88
Change-$0.26 (-0.60%)
Volume$27.18K
Net Assets289.03M
SCHA vs XSHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHA vs. XSHQ commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHA is a Hold and XSHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18B vs. XSHQ (289M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than XSHQ: SCHA (3.048) vs XSHQ (1.888). SCHA was incepted earlier than XSHQ: SCHA (16 years) vs XSHQ (8 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than XSHQ (0.29). XSHQ has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| SCHA | XSHQ | SCHA / XSHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 3.048 | 1.888 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 18B | 289M | 6,228% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.29 | 14% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 86.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 1.53 | 1.27 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHA | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||
XSHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSHQ has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSHQ jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XSHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSHQ | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| APAM - XSHQ | 81% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| AX - XSHQ | 81% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| CATY - XSHQ | 80% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| NPO - XSHQ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| FELE - XSHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||