Ad is loading...
SCHA vs SMMD
SCHA vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts SCHA vs SMMD
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$24.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$1.93K
Net Assets16.93B
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$65.78
Change+$0.10 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.64K
Net Assets1.47B
SCHA vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHA vs. SMMD commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHA is a Buy and SMMD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 16.9B vs. SMMD (1.47B). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHA: SMMD (-3.122) vs SCHA (-5.083). SCHA was incepted earlier than SMMD: SCHA (16 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SMMD (0.15). SCHA has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| SCHA | SMMD | SCHA / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -5.083 | -3.122 | 163% |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 1.47B | 1,150% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.15 | 27% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 9.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 1.45 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHA | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||