Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHA vs SMIZ
SCHA vs SMIZ Comparison
Open Charts SCHA vs SMIZ
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$30.45
Change+$2.41 (+8.59%)
Volume$3.45M
Net Assets20.48B
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
Price$38.93
Change+$1.72 (+4.62%)
Volume$22.98K
Net Assets193.33M
SCHA vs SMIZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHA vs. SMIZ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHA is a Hold and SMIZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 20.5B vs. SMIZ (193M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than SMIZ: SCHA (6.917) vs SMIZ (5.245). SCHA was incepted earlier than SMIZ: SCHA (16 years) vs SMIZ (2 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SMIZ (0.55). SMIZ has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| SCHA | SMIZ | SCHA / SMIZ | |
| Gain YTD | 6.917 | 5.245 | 132% |
| Net Assets | 20.5B | 193M | 10,622% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.55 | 7% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 103.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 1.19 | 0.59 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHA | SMIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||
SMIZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMIZ has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMIZ jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMIZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMIZ | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| JHG - SMIZ | 83% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| FLS - SMIZ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| MC - SMIZ | 81% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| KKR - SMIZ | 80% Closely correlated | -9.69% | ||
| SEIC - SMIZ | 78% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
More | ||||