Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHA vs SMIZ
SCHA vs SMIZ Comparison
Open Charts SCHA vs SMIZ
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$27.77
Change-$0.11 (-0.39%)
Volume$4.3M
Net Assets18.81B
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
Price$36.81
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$6.69K
Net Assets152.86M
SCHA vs SMIZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHA vs. SMIZ commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHA is a Buy and SMIZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.8B vs. SMIZ (153M). SMIZ has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHA: SMIZ (10.943) vs SCHA (8.328). SCHA was incepted earlier than SMIZ: SCHA (16 years) vs SMIZ (2 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SMIZ (0.55). SMIZ has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| SCHA | SMIZ | SCHA / SMIZ | |
| Gain YTD | 8.328 | 10.943 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 18.8B | 153M | 12,288% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.55 | 7% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 103.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 1.42 | 0.40 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHA | SMIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.74% | ||
More | ||||
SMIZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMIZ has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMIZ jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMIZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMIZ | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| JHG - SMIZ | 84% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| FLS - SMIZ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| MC - SMIZ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| KKR - SMIZ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| SEIC - SMIZ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||