SCGPY
Price
$2.98
Change
-$0.20 (-6.29%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.27B
SCTBF
Price
$14.50
Change
-$0.75 (-4.92%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
8.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCGPY vs SCTBF

Header iconSCGPY vs SCTBF Comparison
Open Charts SCGPY vs SCTBFBanner chart's image
Serco Group
Price$2.98
Change-$0.20 (-6.29%)
Volume$3.55K
Capitalization3.27B
Securitas A B
Price$14.50
Change-$0.75 (-4.92%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.46B
SCGPY vs SCTBF Comparison Chart in %
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCGPY vs. SCTBF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCGPY is a Hold and SCTBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SCGPY: $2.98 vs. SCTBF: $14.50)
Brand notoriety: SCGPY and SCTBF are both not notable
SCGPY represents the Office Equipment/Supplies, while SCTBF is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCGPY: 314% vs. SCTBF: 4%
Market capitalization -- SCGPY: $3.27B vs. SCTBF: $8.46B
SCGPY [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $3.27B. SCTBF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $8.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.21B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCGPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCGPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCTBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCGPY is a better buy in the long-term than SCTBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCGPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCGPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCTBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCGPY is a better buy in the short-term than SCTBF.

Price Growth

SCGPY (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -11.31% price change this week, while SCTBF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.17% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-0.48% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCTBF($8.46B) has a higher market cap than SCGPY($3.27B). SCGPY has higher P/E ratio than SCTBF: SCGPY (44.29) vs SCTBF (14.09). SCGPY YTD gains are higher at: 74.379 vs. SCTBF (11.538). SCTBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. SCGPY (346M). SCTBF has more cash in the bank: 6.82B vs. SCGPY (174M). SCGPY has less debt than SCTBF: SCGPY (957M) vs SCTBF (44.3B). SCTBF has higher revenues than SCGPY: SCTBF (160B) vs SCGPY (4.85B).
SCGPYSCTBFSCGPY / SCTBF
Capitalization3.27B8.46B39%
EBITDA346M12.6B3%
Gain YTD74.37911.538645%
P/E Ratio44.2914.09314%
Revenue4.85B160B3%
Total Cash174M6.82B3%
Total Debt957M44.3B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCGPY vs SCTBF: Fundamental Ratings
SCGPY
SCTBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
9155
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCTBF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (33). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCTBF (100). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCGPY (91). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SCTBF (60). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew similarly to SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCTBF (99). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCGPYSCTBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UDI30.57N/A
N/A
USCF ESG Dividend Income ETF
IQHI26.29N/A
N/A
NYLI MacKay High Income ETF
LIAT130.68N/A
N/A
Stone Ridge 2059 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF
BCAT14.44-0.02
-0.14%
BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust
JGH12.89-0.03
-0.23%
NUVEEN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND

SCGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGPY has been loosely correlated with SECUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGPY jumps, then SECUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGPY
1D Price
Change %
SCGPY100%
N/A
SECUF - SCGPY
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
BMBLF - SCGPY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
CASS - SCGPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
GHC - SCGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
BRC - SCGPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More

SCTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBF and NAUH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBF and NAUH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBF
1D Price
Change %
SCTBF100%
N/A
NAUH - SCTBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUBG - SCTBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-11.74%
SDXOF - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSKIA - SCTBF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More