SCEYF
Price
$10.60
Change
+$0.50 (+4.95%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
137.01M
XPRO
Price
$12.32
Change
-$0.15 (-1.20%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.44B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCEYF vs XPRO

Header iconSCEYF vs XPRO Comparison
Open Charts SCEYF vs XPROBanner chart's image
Source Energy Services
Price$10.60
Change+$0.50 (+4.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization137.01M
Expro Group Holdings
Price$12.32
Change-$0.15 (-1.20%)
Volume$6.43K
Capitalization1.44B
SCEYF vs XPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCEYF vs. XPRO commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCEYF is a Hold and XPRO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (SCEYF: $10.60 vs. XPRO: $12.47)
Brand notoriety: SCEYF and XPRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCEYF: 11% vs. XPRO: 88%
Market capitalization -- SCEYF: $135.31M vs. XPRO: $1.42B
SCEYF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $135.31M. XPRO’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $1.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCEYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXPRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SCEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XPRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the long-term than XPRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCEYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPRO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCEYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XPRO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the short-term than XPRO.

Price Growth

SCEYF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.91% price change this week, while XPRO (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

XPRO is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.61% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XPRO($1.44B) has a higher market cap than SCEYF($137M). XPRO has higher P/E ratio than SCEYF: XPRO (20.44) vs SCEYF (4.94). XPRO YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SCEYF (-5.610). XPRO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 292M vs. SCEYF (142M). XPRO has more cash in the bank: 207M vs. SCEYF (43.8M). XPRO has less debt than SCEYF: XPRO (213M) vs SCEYF (276M). XPRO has higher revenues than SCEYF: XPRO (1.67B) vs SCEYF (738M).
SCEYFXPROSCEYF / XPRO
Capitalization137M1.44B10%
EBITDA142M292M49%
Gain YTD-5.6100.000-
P/E Ratio4.9420.4424%
Revenue738M1.67B44%
Total Cash43.8M207M21%
Total Debt276M213M130%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCEYF vs XPRO: Fundamental Ratings
SCEYF
XPRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3662
SMR RATING
1..100
4586
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
399
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCEYF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as XPRO (67). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

SCEYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as XPRO (62). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

SCEYF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPRO (86). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

XPRO's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SCEYF (45). This means that XPRO’s stock grew similarly to SCEYF’s over the last 12 months.

SCEYF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for XPRO (99). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew significantly faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCEYFXPRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBEAX11.310.01
+0.09%
Allspring Large Cap Value CL A
PMYZX46.24-0.25
-0.54%
Putnam Core Equity Fund R
NUICX30.34-0.18
-0.59%
Nuveen International Dividend Growth C
VNSYX24.25-0.20
-0.82%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select Y
TCMSX44.66-0.45
-1.00%
Voya Small Cap Growth I

SCEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCEYF and ACDC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCEYF and ACDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCEYF
1D Price
Change %
SCEYF100%
N/A
ACDC - SCEYF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.44%
XPRO - SCEYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
WFRD - SCEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
JUTOY - SCEYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZPZY - SCEYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

XPRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPRO has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XPRO jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPRO
1D Price
Change %
XPRO100%
-0.72%
HAL - XPRO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
WFRD - XPRO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
RNGR - XPRO
66%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
SLB - XPRO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
HLX - XPRO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More