SCEYF
Price
$10.60
Change
+$0.50 (+4.95%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
137.01M
WFRD
Price
$64.81
Change
+$1.10 (+1.73%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.58B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCEYF vs WFRD

Header iconSCEYF vs WFRD Comparison
Open Charts SCEYF vs WFRDBanner chart's image
Source Energy Services
Price$10.60
Change+$0.50 (+4.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization137.01M
Weatherford International
Price$64.81
Change+$1.10 (+1.73%)
Volume$9.37K
Capitalization4.58B
SCEYF vs WFRD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCEYF vs. WFRD commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCEYF is a Hold and WFRD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (SCEYF: $10.60 vs. WFRD: $63.71)
Brand notoriety: SCEYF and WFRD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCEYF: 11% vs. WFRD: 79%
Market capitalization -- SCEYF: $135.31M vs. WFRD: $4.65B
SCEYF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $135.31M. WFRD’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCEYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFRD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the long-term than WFRD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCEYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFRD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCEYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFRD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the short-term than WFRD.

Price Growth

SCEYF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.91% price change this week, while WFRD (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +4.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFRD is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.61% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRD($4.58B) has a higher market cap than SCEYF($137M). WFRD has higher P/E ratio than SCEYF: WFRD (9.82) vs SCEYF (4.94). SCEYF YTD gains are higher at: -5.610 vs. WFRD (-9.839). WFRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.08B vs. SCEYF (142M). WFRD has more cash in the bank: 943M vs. SCEYF (43.8M). SCEYF has less debt than WFRD: SCEYF (276M) vs WFRD (1.75B). WFRD has higher revenues than SCEYF: WFRD (5.15B) vs SCEYF (738M).
SCEYFWFRDSCEYF / WFRD
Capitalization137M4.58B3%
EBITDA142M1.08B13%
Gain YTD-5.610-9.83957%
P/E Ratio4.949.8250%
Revenue738M5.15B14%
Total Cash43.8M943M5%
Total Debt276M1.75B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCEYF: Fundamental Ratings
SCEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCEYFWFRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRGRX49.16-0.01
-0.02%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income R
GSURX65.77-0.40
-0.60%
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights R
RAEBX44.09-0.37
-0.83%
American Funds AMCAP R2E
KMVAX38.39-0.33
-0.85%
Kirr Marbach Partners Value
FMGGX51.37-0.46
-0.89%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth R6

SCEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCEYF and ACDC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCEYF and ACDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCEYF
1D Price
Change %
SCEYF100%
N/A
ACDC - SCEYF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.44%
XPRO - SCEYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
WFRD - SCEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
JUTOY - SCEYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZPZY - SCEYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WFRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFRD has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFRD jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRD
1D Price
Change %
WFRD100%
-0.51%
SLB - WFRD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
HAL - WFRD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
OII - WFRD
79%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
RES - WFRD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
WHD - WFRD
74%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
More