SCBGF
Price
$18.58
Change
-$1.40 (-7.01%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.24B
VRLAF
Price
$29.74
Change
+$0.54 (+1.85%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCBGF vs VRLAF

Header iconSCBGF vs VRLAF Comparison
Open Charts SCBGF vs VRLAFBanner chart's image
SIG GROUP AG
Price$18.58
Change-$1.40 (-7.01%)
Volume$250
Capitalization10.24B
VERALLIA, COURBEVOIE
Price$29.74
Change+$0.54 (+1.85%)
Volume$4.63K
Capitalization5.2B
SCBGF vs VRLAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCBGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCBGF vs. VRLAF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCBGF is a Hold and VRLAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SCBGF: $18.58 vs. VRLAF: $29.74)
Brand notoriety: SCBGF and VRLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCBGF: 18% vs. VRLAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SCBGF: $10.24B vs. VRLAF: $5.2B
SCBGF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $10.24B. VRLAF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $5.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCBGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRLAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SCBGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRLAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRLAF is a better buy in the long-term than SCBGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCBGF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SCBGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

SCBGF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -7.01% price change this week, while VRLAF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.71% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBGF($10.2B) has a higher market cap than VRLAF($5.2B). SCBGF has higher P/E ratio than VRLAF: SCBGF (454.55) vs VRLAF (11.44). VRLAF YTD gains are higher at: 18.944 vs. SCBGF (-5.740). VRLAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 920M vs. SCBGF (502M). SCBGF has more cash in the bank: 490M vs. VRLAF (332M). VRLAF has less debt than SCBGF: VRLAF (1.76B) vs SCBGF (2.68B). VRLAF has higher revenues than SCBGF: VRLAF (3.35B) vs SCBGF (2.78B).
SCBGFVRLAFSCBGF / VRLAF
Capitalization10.2B5.2B196%
EBITDA502M920M55%
Gain YTD-5.74018.944-30%
P/E Ratio454.5511.443,973%
Revenue2.78B3.35B83%
Total Cash490M332M148%
Total Debt2.68B1.76B152%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCBGFVRLAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCBGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPGD72.430.62
+0.87%
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Imp ETF
FELV32.260.23
+0.72%
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
AIVL114.280.69
+0.61%
WisdomTree US Al Enhanced Val ETF
BKIV37.32N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Innovators ETF
DRAG24.80-0.36
-1.43%
Roundhill China Dragons ETF

SCBGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCBGF and NEXNF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCBGF and NEXNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBGF
1D Price
Change %
SCBGF100%
N/A
NEXNF - SCBGF
13%
Poorly correlated
-6.12%
OCTO - SCBGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
KRT - SCBGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
AMBP - SCBGF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
VRLAF - SCBGF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VRLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRLAF and OCTO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRLAF and OCTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRLAF
1D Price
Change %
VRLAF100%
N/A
OCTO - VRLAF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
ORRAF - VRLAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEXNF - VRLAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-6.12%
MGIH - VRLAF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
KRT - VRLAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More