Advertisement
SCBGF vs VRLAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCBGF is a Hold and VRLAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCBGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRLAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SCBGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VRLAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SCBGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SCBGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SCBGF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRLAF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.19%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (+2.52% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| SCBGF | VRLAF | SCBGF / VRLAF | |
| Capitalization | 10.2B | 5.2B | 196% |
| EBITDA | 502M | 920M | 55% |
| Gain YTD | -4.205 | 18.944 | -22% |
| P/E Ratio | 454.55 | 11.44 | 3,973% |
| Revenue | 2.78B | 3.35B | 83% |
| Total Cash | 490M | 332M | 148% |
| Total Debt | 2.68B | 1.76B | 152% |
| SCBGF | VRLAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 9% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 55% | N/A |
Advertisement
SCBGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCBGF and NEXNF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCBGF and NEXNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCBGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCBGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEXNF - SCBGF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| OCTO - SCBGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +72.03% | ||
| KRT - SCBGF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AMBP - SCBGF | -4% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| VRLAF - SCBGF | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
VRLAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that VRLAF and OCTO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRLAF and OCTO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRLAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRLAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OCTO - VRLAF | 9% Poorly correlated | +72.03% | ||
| ORRAF - VRLAF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NEXNF - VRLAF | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| MGIH - VRLAF | -2% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
| KRT - VRLAF | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||