SCBFY
Price
$33.35
Change
+$0.45 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.81B
SVNLY
Price
$6.63
Change
+$0.07 (+1.07%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.44B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCBFY vs SVNLY

Header iconSCBFY vs SVNLY Comparison
Open Charts SCBFY vs SVNLYBanner chart's image
Standard Chartered
Price$33.35
Change+$0.45 (+1.37%)
Volume$38.03K
Capitalization26.81B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$6.63
Change+$0.07 (+1.07%)
Volume$143.68K
Capitalization17.44B
SCBFY vs SVNLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCBFY vs. SVNLY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCBFY is a StrongBuy and SVNLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SCBFY: $33.35 vs. SVNLY: $6.64)
Brand notoriety: SCBFY and SVNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCBFY: 29% vs. SVNLY: 121%
Market capitalization -- SCBFY: $26.81B vs. SVNLY: $17.44B
SCBFY [@Major Banks] is valued at $26.81B. SVNLY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $17.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCBFY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SVNLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the long-term than SVNLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCBFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVNLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the short-term than SVNLY.

Price Growth

SCBFY (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.14% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was +1.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($26.8B) has a higher market cap than SVNLY($17.4B). SCBFY has higher P/E ratio than SVNLY: SCBFY (9.88) vs SVNLY (7.17). SVNLY YTD gains are higher at: 67.517 vs. SCBFY (36.146). SCBFY has less debt than SVNLY: SCBFY (93.9B) vs SVNLY (1.6T). SVNLY has higher revenues than SCBFY: SVNLY (57B) vs SCBFY (17.1B).
SCBFYSVNLYSCBFY / SVNLY
Capitalization26.8B17.4B154%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.14667.51754%
P/E Ratio9.887.17138%
Revenue17.1B57B30%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt93.9B1.6T6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVNLY: Fundamental Ratings
SVNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
2
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCBFYSVNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTDR13.770.69
+5.28%
Bitdeer Technologies Group
ALVO9.190.26
+2.91%
Alvotech
CAH164.932.95
+1.82%
Cardinal Health
FBRX13.66-0.18
-1.30%
Forte Biosciences Inc
CARM0.40-0.02
-4.05%
Carisma Therapeutics

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
+1.37%
HSBC - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
BCS - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
ING - SCBFY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
SAN - SCBFY
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
AAVMY - SCBFY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
More

SVNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with NABZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then NABZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLY
1D Price
Change %
SVNLY100%
+0.99%
NABZY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
ANZGY - SVNLY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
SVNLF - SVNLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
NTIOF - SVNLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
SCBFY - SVNLY
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More