SCBFY
Price
$35.74
Change
-$2.82 (-7.31%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
44.14B
SVNLY
Price
$6.46
Change
-$0.05 (-0.77%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
26.28B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCBFY vs SVNLY

Header iconSCBFY vs SVNLY Comparison
Open Charts SCBFY vs SVNLYBanner chart's image
Standard Chartered
Price$35.74
Change-$2.82 (-7.31%)
Volume$122.4K
Capitalization44.14B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$6.46
Change-$0.05 (-0.77%)
Volume$234.05K
Capitalization26.28B
SCBFY vs SVNLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCBFY vs. SVNLY commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCBFY is a Hold and SVNLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SCBFY: $35.74 vs. SVNLY: $6.46)
Brand notoriety: SCBFY and SVNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCBFY: 250% vs. SVNLY: 141%
Market capitalization -- SCBFY: $44.14B vs. SVNLY: $26.28B
SCBFY [@Major Banks] is valued at $44.14B. SVNLY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $798.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCBFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVNLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the long-term than SVNLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCBFY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SVNLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLY is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

SCBFY (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.22% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($44.1B) has a higher market cap than SVNLY($26.3B). SCBFY (9.82) and SVNLY (9.35) have similar P/E ratio . SVNLY YTD gains are higher at: 63.099 vs. SCBFY (46.861). SCBFY has less debt than SVNLY: SCBFY (99.4B) vs SVNLY (1.57T).
SCBFYSVNLYSCBFY / SVNLY
Capitalization44.1B26.3B168%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.86163.09974%
P/E Ratio9.829.35105%
RevenueN/A60.1B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt99.4B1.57T6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCBFY vs SVNLY: Fundamental Ratings
SCBFY
SVNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8224
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1023
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFY's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVNLY (97). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (23). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (43). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (35). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCBFYSVNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHAR11.650.27
+2.37%
Pharming Group NV
XYL140.81-1.03
-0.73%
Xylem
BVFL16.25-0.19
-1.16%
BV Financial
CXAI0.83-0.01
-1.37%
CXApp
CNS74.93-1.70
-2.22%
Cohen & Steers

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-7.31%
HSBC - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
BCS - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
ING - SCBFY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
SAN - SCBFY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
AAVMY - SCBFY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
More

SVNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with NABZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then NABZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLY
1D Price
Change %
SVNLY100%
-0.77%
NABZY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
ANZGY - SVNLY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
SVNLF - SVNLY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTIOF - SVNLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
SCBFY - SVNLY
16%
Poorly correlated
-7.31%
More