SCBFY
Price
$52.13
Change
+$13.39 (+34.56%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
58.68B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVNLF
Price
$16.19
Change
+$3.08 (+23.49%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
31.93B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCBFY vs SVNLF

Header iconSCBFY vs SVNLF Comparison
Open Charts SCBFY vs SVNLFBanner chart's image
Standard Chartered
Price$52.13
Change+$13.39 (+34.56%)
Volume$262.13K
Capitalization58.68B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$16.19
Change+$3.08 (+23.49%)
Volume$178
Capitalization31.93B
SCBFY vs SVNLF Comparison Chart in %
SCBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVNLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCBFY vs. SVNLF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCBFY is a Hold and SVNLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (SCBFY: $52.13 vs. SVNLF: $16.19)
Brand notoriety: SCBFY and SVNLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCBFY: 156% vs. SVNLF: 2%
Market capitalization -- SCBFY: $58.68B vs. SVNLF: $31.93B
SCBFY [@Major Banks] is valued at $58.68B. SVNLF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $31.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $848.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $146.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCBFY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SVNLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SCBFY and SVNLF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCBFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVNLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SCBFY and SVNLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SCBFY (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while SVNLF (@Major Banks) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.93% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($58.7B) has a higher market cap than SVNLF($31.9B). SCBFY has higher P/E ratio than SVNLF: SCBFY (13.75) vs SVNLF (11.46). SVNLF YTD gains are higher at: 8.094 vs. SCBFY (5.398). SCBFY has less debt than SVNLF: SCBFY (84B) vs SVNLF (1.53T). SVNLF has higher revenues than SCBFY: SVNLF (58.7B) vs SCBFY (21.1B).
SCBFYSVNLFSCBFY / SVNLF
Capitalization58.7B31.9B184%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.3988.09467%
P/E Ratio13.7511.46120%
Revenue21.1B58.7B36%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt84B1.53T6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCBFY vs SVNLF: Fundamental Ratings
SCBFY
SVNLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2475
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
537
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1524
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFY's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLF (98). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLF (37). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6). This means that SVNLF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLF (43). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLF (24). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCBFYSVNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVNLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACI17.450.59
+3.50%
Albertsons Companies
ARCO8.410.17
+2.06%
Arcos Dorados Holdings
APT4.920.01
+0.20%
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd
WTGUU10.30N/A
N/A
Wintergreen Acquisition Corp.
USNA20.44-1.22
-5.63%
USANA Health Sciences

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-1.59%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
-6.36%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
More

SVNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLF has been loosely correlated with SVNLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLF jumps, then SVNLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLF
1D Price
Change %
SVNLF100%
+1.97%
SVNLY - SVNLF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
ANZGY - SVNLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
SCBFY - SVNLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
ANZGF - SVNLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBNF - SVNLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More