SCBFY
Price
$35.74
Change
-$2.82 (-7.31%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
44.14B
SVNLF
Price
$12.98
Change
+$0.29 (+2.29%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
26.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCBFY vs SVNLF

Header iconSCBFY vs SVNLF Comparison
Open Charts SCBFY vs SVNLFBanner chart's image
Standard Chartered
Price$35.74
Change-$2.82 (-7.31%)
Volume$122.4K
Capitalization44.14B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$12.98
Change+$0.29 (+2.29%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization26.28B
SCBFY vs SVNLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCBFY vs. SVNLF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCBFY is a Hold and SVNLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SCBFY: $35.74 vs. SVNLF: $12.98)
Brand notoriety: SCBFY and SVNLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCBFY: 250% vs. SVNLF: 23%
Market capitalization -- SCBFY: $44.14B vs. SVNLF: $26.28B
SCBFY [@Major Banks] is valued at $44.14B. SVNLF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $798.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCBFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVNLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the long-term than SVNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCBFY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SVNLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLF is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

SCBFY (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.22% price change this week, while SVNLF (@Major Banks) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFY($44.1B) has a higher market cap than SVNLF($26.3B). SCBFY (9.82) and SVNLF (9.39) have similar P/E ratio . SCBFY YTD gains are higher at: 46.861 vs. SVNLF (24.916). SCBFY has less debt than SVNLF: SCBFY (99.4B) vs SVNLF (1.57T).
SCBFYSVNLFSCBFY / SVNLF
Capitalization44.1B26.3B168%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.86124.916188%
P/E Ratio9.829.39105%
RevenueN/A60.1B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt99.4B1.57T6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCBFY vs SVNLF: Fundamental Ratings
SCBFY
SVNLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8228
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1050
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3527
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFY's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVNLF (97). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVNLF (50). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6). This means that SVNLF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLF (52). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SVNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (35). This means that SVNLF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCBFYSVNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHAR11.650.27
+2.37%
Pharming Group NV
XYL140.81-1.03
-0.73%
Xylem
BVFL16.25-0.19
-1.16%
BV Financial
CXAI0.83-0.01
-1.37%
CXApp
CNS74.93-1.70
-2.22%
Cohen & Steers

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-7.31%
HSBC - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
BCS - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
ING - SCBFY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
SAN - SCBFY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
AAVMY - SCBFY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
More

SVNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVNLF and SVNLY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVNLF and SVNLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLF
1D Price
Change %
SVNLF100%
N/A
SVNLY - SVNLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
ANZGF - SVNLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGY - SVNLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
SCBFY - SVNLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-7.31%
WEBNF - SVNLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
More