SCBFF
Price
$21.10
Change
+$0.04 (+0.19%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
49.11B
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCBFY
Price
$43.33
Change
-$0.20 (-0.46%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
49.11B
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCBFF vs SCBFY

Header iconSCBFF vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts SCBFF vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
Standard Chartered
Price$21.10
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
Volume$3.27K
Capitalization49.11B
Standard Chartered
Price$43.33
Change-$0.20 (-0.46%)
Volume$68.81K
Capitalization49.11B
SCBFF vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
SCBFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCBFF vs. SCBFY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCBFF is a Buy and SCBFY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (SCBFF: $21.06 vs. SCBFY: $43.53)
Brand notoriety: SCBFF and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCBFF: 12% vs. SCBFY: 147%
Market capitalization -- SCBFF: $49.11B vs. SCBFY: $49.11B
SCBFF [@Major Banks] is valued at $49.11B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $49.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $842.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCBFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SCBFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SCBFF and SCBFY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCBFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCBFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFY is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFF.

Price Growth

SCBFF (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.36% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was +3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFF is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBFF($49.1B) and SCBFY($49.1B) have the same market capitalization . SCBFY (11.43) and SCBFF (11.13) have similar P/E ratio . SCBFF (80.991) and SCBFY (78.871) have similar YTD gains . SCBFF (99.4B) and SCBFY (99.4B) have identical debt. SCBFF (20.5B) and SCBFY (20.5B) have equivalent revenues.
SCBFFSCBFYSCBFF / SCBFY
Capitalization49.1B49.1B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD80.99178.871103%
P/E Ratio11.1311.4397%
Revenue20.5B20.5B100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt99.4B99.4B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCBFF vs SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
SCBFF
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1413
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
12n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (63). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (40). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFF (14). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to SCBFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCBFFSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCBFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAX18.700.45
+2.47%
Baxter International
RFL1.27N/A
N/A
Rafael Holdings
CHSCO26.61-0.09
-0.32%
CHS
VSTA4.93-0.04
-0.74%
Vasta Platform Limited
PRKS33.62-0.71
-2.07%
United Parks & Resorts

SCBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFF has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFF jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFF
1D Price
Change %
SCBFF100%
-0.06%
SCBFY - SCBFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
AAVMY - SCBFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
NABZY - SCBFF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
IDCBY - SCBFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
NAUBF - SCBFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
+0.58%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More