Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCAVX vs SSGSX
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SCAVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCAVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCAVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. SCAVX (542M). SCAVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SCAVX (0.94) vs SSGSX (0.49). SCAVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SCAVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than SCAVX (1.17). SCAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than SCAVX (4%) vs SCAVX (4%). SCAVX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.19 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). SCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 30.38 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| SCAVX | SSGSX | SCAVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.160 | -0.129 | 898% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 542M | 5.23B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.49 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.19 | -12.62 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.07 | -6.25 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.38 | 8.71 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.30 | 20.45 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement