Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCAVX vs SSGSX
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SCAVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCAVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCAVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. SCAVX (576M). SCAVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SCAVX (0.97) vs SSGSX (0.51). SCAVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SCAVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than SCAVX (1.17). SCAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than SCAVX (4%) vs SCAVX (4%). SCAVX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.17 vs. SSGSX (-8.77). SCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 53.14 vs. SSGSX (23.49).
| SCAVX | SSGSX | SCAVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.365 | -2.283 | 60% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 576M | 5.73B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.51 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.17 | -8.77 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.62 | -2.14 | -357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.14 | 23.49 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.43 | 18.39 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement