Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCAVX vs SSGSX
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SCAVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCAVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCAVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. SCAVX (545M). SCAVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SCAVX (0.93) vs SSGSX (0.48). SCAVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SCAVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than SCAVX (1.17). SCAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than SCAVX (4%) vs SCAVX (4%). SCAVX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. SCAVX (-3.53). SCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 12.87 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| SCAVX | SSGSX | SCAVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.23 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.23 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.867 | -1.723 | 166% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 545M | 5.12B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.48 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | -2.42 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.80 | 0.45 | 2,816% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.87 | -0.63 | -2,028% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.36 | 18.71 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement