SCABY
Price
$14.60
Change
+$1.75 (+13.62%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.65B
SVCBF
Price
$13.74
Change
+$0.24 (+1.78%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
9.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCABY vs SVCBF

Header iconSCABY vs SVCBF Comparison
Open Charts SCABY vs SVCBFBanner chart's image
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$14.60
Change+$1.75 (+13.62%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.65B
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.74
Change+$0.24 (+1.78%)
Volume$510
Capitalization9.65B
SCABY vs SVCBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCABY vs. SVCBF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCABY is a Hold and SVCBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (SCABY: $14.60 vs. SVCBF: $13.74)
Brand notoriety: SCABY and SVCBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCABY: 2% vs. SVCBF: 66%
Market capitalization -- SCABY: $9.65B vs. SVCBF: $9.65B
SCABY [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $9.65B. SVCBF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $9.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $15.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCABY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVCBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SCABY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCABY is a better buy in the long-term than SVCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCABY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVCBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCABY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVCBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCABY is a better buy in the short-term than SVCBF.

Price Growth

SCABY (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +6.96% price change this week, while SVCBF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +9.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+3.43% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.65B) and SVCBF($9.65B) have the same market capitalization . SCABY has higher P/E ratio than SVCBF: SCABY (26.07) vs SVCBF (24.54). SCABY YTD gains are higher at: 32.148 vs. SVCBF (12.163). SCABY (7.32B) and SVCBF (7.32B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SCABY (74M) and SVCBF (74M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SCABY (544M) and SVCBF (544M) have identical debt. SCABY (20.9B) and SVCBF (20.9B) have equivalent revenues.
SCABYSVCBFSCABY / SVCBF
Capitalization9.65B9.65B100%
EBITDA7.32B7.32B100%
Gain YTD32.14812.163264%
P/E Ratio26.0724.54106%
Revenue20.9B20.9B100%
Total Cash74M74M100%
Total Debt544M544M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVCBF: Fundamental Ratings
SVCBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCABYSVCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IUSG156.521.01
+0.65%
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
EZM62.520.14
+0.22%
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings ETF
AVMC66.800.05
+0.08%
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
GNOM8.71N/A
+0.04%
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF
PMIO49.87N/A
N/A
PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
N/A
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
RUBNF - SCABY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCBF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
STLJF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
More

SVCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVCBF and WFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVCBF and WFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVCBF
1D Price
Change %
SVCBF100%
+1.78%
WFG - SVCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
IFSPF - SVCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
TCOR - SVCBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMTC - SVCBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUBNF - SVCBF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More