SCABY
Price
$13.68
Change
+$1.29 (+10.41%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.19B
SVCBF
Price
$13.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
9.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCABY vs SVCBF

Header iconSCABY vs SVCBF Comparison
Open Charts SCABY vs SVCBFBanner chart's image
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.68
Change+$1.29 (+10.41%)
Volume$318
Capitalization9.19B
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.13K
Capitalization9.19B
SCABY vs SVCBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCABY vs. SVCBF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCABY is a Hold and SVCBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (SCABY: $13.68 vs. SVCBF: $13.05)
Brand notoriety: SCABY and SVCBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCABY: 18% vs. SVCBF: 144%
Market capitalization -- SCABY: $9.19B vs. SVCBF: $9.19B
SCABY [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $9.19B. SVCBF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $9.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCABY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVCBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCABY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVCBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SCABY and SVCBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCABY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVCBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCABY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVCBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCABY is a better buy in the short-term than SVCBF.

Price Growth

SCABY (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +4.35% price change this week, while SVCBF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-0.64% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.19B) and SVCBF($9.19B) have the same market capitalization . SCABY (23.96) and SVCBF (22.86) have similar P/E ratio . SCABY YTD gains are higher at: 23.821 vs. SVCBF (6.531). SCABY (7.32B) and SVCBF (7.32B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SCABY (74M) and SVCBF (74M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SCABY (544M) and SVCBF (544M) have identical debt. SCABY (20.9B) and SVCBF (20.9B) have equivalent revenues.
SCABYSVCBFSCABY / SVCBF
Capitalization9.19B9.19B100%
EBITDA7.32B7.32B100%
Gain YTD23.8216.531365%
P/E Ratio23.9622.86105%
Revenue20.9B20.9B100%
Total Cash74M74M100%
Total Debt544M544M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVCBF: Fundamental Ratings
SVCBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCABYSVCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHF48.840.32
+0.66%
iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF
BSL14.090.05
+0.33%
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund
GOVT23.140.06
+0.24%
iShares US Treasury Bond ETF
JULZ46.17-0.21
-0.46%
Trueshares Structured Outcome July ETF
ELIL16.11-0.30
-1.81%
Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
+10.37%
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
RUBNF - SCABY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCBF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STLJF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SVCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVCBF and WFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVCBF and WFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVCBF
1D Price
Change %
SVCBF100%
N/A
WFG - SVCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
IFSPF - SVCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
TCOR - SVCBF
0%
Poorly correlated
+13.84%
HMTC - SVCBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
RUBNF - SVCBF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More