SCABY
Price
$14.60
Change
+$1.75 (+13.62%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.65B
STLJF
Price
$56.26
Change
+$1.67 (+3.06%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCABY vs STLJF

Header iconSCABY vs STLJF Comparison
Open Charts SCABY vs STLJFBanner chart's image
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$14.60
Change+$1.75 (+13.62%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.65B
Stella Jones
Price$56.26
Change+$1.67 (+3.06%)
Volume$303
Capitalization3.13B
SCABY vs STLJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCABY vs. STLJF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCABY is a Hold and STLJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (SCABY: $14.60 vs. STLJF: $56.26)
Brand notoriety: SCABY and STLJF are both not notable
SCABY represents the Pulp & Paper, while STLJF is part of the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCABY: 2% vs. STLJF: 17%
Market capitalization -- SCABY: $9.65B vs. STLJF: $3.13B
SCABY [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $9.65B. STLJF’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $15.1B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $7.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCABY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCABY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLJF is a better buy in the long-term than SCABY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCABY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLJF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCABY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • STLJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SCABY and STLJF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SCABY (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +6.96% price change this week, while STLJF (@Forest Products) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+3.43% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

@Forest Products (-0.39% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.65B) has a higher market cap than STLJF($3.13B). SCABY has higher P/E ratio than STLJF: SCABY (26.07) vs STLJF (13.01). SCABY YTD gains are higher at: 32.148 vs. STLJF (13.786). SCABY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.32B vs. STLJF (656M). STLJF has more cash in the bank: 81M vs. SCABY (74M). SCABY has less debt than STLJF: SCABY (544M) vs STLJF (1.8B). SCABY has higher revenues than STLJF: SCABY (20.9B) vs STLJF (3.47B).
SCABYSTLJFSCABY / STLJF
Capitalization9.65B3.13B309%
EBITDA7.32B656M1,116%
Gain YTD32.14813.786233%
P/E Ratio26.0713.01200%
Revenue20.9B3.47B603%
Total Cash74M81M91%
Total Debt544M1.8B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STLJF: Fundamental Ratings
STLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCABYSTLJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAMTX24.980.15
+0.60%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R5
JGYIX13.020.05
+0.39%
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield I
CLBEX37.060.12
+0.32%
American Funds American Balanced 529E
FAOCX35.440.04
+0.11%
Fidelity Advisor Overseas C
VESMX18.79-0.06
-0.32%
VELA Small Cap I

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
N/A
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
RUBNF - SCABY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCBF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
STLJF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
More

STLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STLJF and NWGL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STLJF and NWGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLJF
1D Price
Change %
STLJF100%
+3.05%
NWGL - STLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
HMTC - STLJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSPF - STLJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
TCOR - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCABY - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More