SCABY
Price
$13.68
Change
+$1.29 (+10.41%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.19B
STLJF
Price
$56.30
Change
-$1.76 (-3.03%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCABY vs STLJF

Header iconSCABY vs STLJF Comparison
Open Charts SCABY vs STLJFBanner chart's image
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.68
Change+$1.29 (+10.41%)
Volume$318
Capitalization9.19B
Stella Jones
Price$56.30
Change-$1.76 (-3.03%)
Volume$6.39K
Capitalization3.11B
SCABY vs STLJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCABY vs. STLJF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCABY is a Hold and STLJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (SCABY: $13.68 vs. STLJF: $56.29)
Brand notoriety: SCABY and STLJF are both not notable
SCABY represents the Pulp & Paper, while STLJF is part of the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCABY: 18% vs. STLJF: 270%
Market capitalization -- SCABY: $9.19B vs. STLJF: $3.11B
SCABY [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $9.19B. STLJF’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $3.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.57B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $7.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.59B. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCABY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCABY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLJF is a better buy in the long-term than SCABY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCABY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCABY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • STLJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCABY is a better buy in the short-term than STLJF.

Price Growth

SCABY (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +4.35% price change this week, while STLJF (@Forest Products) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-0.64% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

@Forest Products (-3.33% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.19B) has a higher market cap than STLJF($3.11B). SCABY has higher P/E ratio than STLJF: SCABY (23.96) vs STLJF (13.06). SCABY YTD gains are higher at: 23.821 vs. STLJF (13.857). SCABY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.32B vs. STLJF (645M). SCABY has more cash in the bank: 74M vs. STLJF (65M). SCABY has less debt than STLJF: SCABY (544M) vs STLJF (1.62B). SCABY has higher revenues than STLJF: SCABY (20.9B) vs STLJF (3.45B).
SCABYSTLJFSCABY / STLJF
Capitalization9.19B3.11B295%
EBITDA7.32B645M1,136%
Gain YTD23.82113.857172%
P/E Ratio23.9613.06183%
Revenue20.9B3.45B605%
Total Cash74M65M114%
Total Debt544M1.62B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STLJF: Fundamental Ratings
STLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCABYSTLJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENHRX10.31N/A
N/A
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income Retail
RGOIX23.73-0.05
-0.21%
RBC Global Opportunities I
VITSX159.73-0.86
-0.54%
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
ANOAX21.49-0.12
-0.56%
American Century Small Cap Growth A
AWAYX24.55-0.14
-0.57%
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy Advisor

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
+10.37%
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
RUBNF - SCABY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCBF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STLJF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STLJF and NWGL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STLJF and NWGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLJF
1D Price
Change %
STLJF100%
N/A
NWGL - STLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
HMTC - STLJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
IFSPF - STLJF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
TCOR - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+13.84%
SCABY - STLJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+10.37%
More