SBYSF
Price
$1.79
Change
+$0.02 (+1.13%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.42B
SGGTF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBYSF vs SGGTF

Header iconSBYSF vs SGGTF Comparison
Open Charts SBYSF vs SGGTFBanner chart's image
Sibanye Stillwater
Price$1.79
Change+$0.02 (+1.13%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.42B
SIGNATURE RES LTD CDA
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$34K
Capitalization2.05M
SBYSF vs SGGTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBYSF vs. SGGTF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBYSF is a Hold and SGGTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SBYSF: $1.79 vs. SGGTF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: SBYSF and SGGTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBYSF: 48% vs. SGGTF: 170%
Market capitalization -- SBYSF: $5.42B vs. SGGTF: $2.05M
SBYSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.42B. SGGTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBYSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGGTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SBYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGGTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBYSF is a better buy in the long-term than SGGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBYSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGGTF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBYSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SGGTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBYSF is a better buy in the short-term than SGGTF.

Price Growth

SBYSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGGTF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBYSF($5.42B) has a higher market cap than SGGTF($2.05M). SBYSF YTD gains are higher at: 100.560 vs. SGGTF (84.400). SBYSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.1B vs. SGGTF (-1.13M). SBYSF has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. SGGTF (158K). SGGTF has less debt than SBYSF: SGGTF (180K) vs SBYSF (21.2B). SBYSF has higher revenues than SGGTF: SBYSF (153B) vs SGGTF (0).
SBYSFSGGTFSBYSF / SGGTF
Capitalization5.42B2.05M264,293%
EBITDA33.1B-1.13M-2,933,383%
Gain YTD100.56084.400119%
P/E Ratio4.89N/A-
Revenue153B0-
Total Cash27.2B158K17,215,190%
Total Debt21.2B180K11,777,778%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBYSF vs SGGTF: Fundamental Ratings
SBYSF
SGGTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBYSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGGTF (74). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (100). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGGTF (93). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (44). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SGGTF (100). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew similarly to SGGTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBYSFSGGTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRIM80.051.35
+1.72%
Primoris Services Corp
COR299.422.84
+0.96%
Cencora
ONIT37.570.11
+0.29%
Onity Group Inc.
VRM28.51-0.01
-0.04%
Vroom Inc
PX10.10-0.06
-0.59%
P10

SBYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBYSF and CCHI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBYSF and CCHI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBYSF
1D Price
Change %
SBYSF100%
N/A
CCHI - SBYSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCHDF - SBYSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
ENDMF - SBYSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDRC - SBYSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
RVSDF - SBYSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
More

SGGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGGTF and VLMZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGGTF and VLMZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGGTF
1D Price
Change %
SGGTF100%
N/A
VLMZF - SGGTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONXGF - SGGTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+27.83%
ENDMF - SGGTF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVSDF - SGGTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
SBYSF - SGGTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More