SBWFF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
88.84M
SIERF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Mar 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBWFF vs SIERF

Header iconSBWFF vs SIERF Comparison
Open Charts SBWFF vs SIERFBanner chart's image
CORNISH METALS
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.4K
Capitalization88.84M
Sierra Grande Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$4.8K
Capitalization2.94M
SBWFF vs SIERF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBWFF vs. SIERF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBWFF is a Hold and SIERF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SBWFF: $0.11 vs. SIERF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: SBWFF and SIERF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBWFF: 162% vs. SIERF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SBWFF: $88.84M vs. SIERF: $2.94M
SBWFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $88.84M. SIERF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIERF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SBWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIERF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBWFF is a better buy in the long-term than SIERF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIERF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SIERF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBWFF is a better buy in the short-term than SIERF.

Price Growth

SBWFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.10% price change this week, while SIERF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBWFF($88.8M) has a higher market cap than SIERF($2.94M). SIERF YTD gains are higher at: 110.210 vs. SBWFF (6.336). SIERF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -791.89K vs. SBWFF (-1.5M). SBWFF has more cash in the bank: 51.9M vs. SIERF (389K). SBWFF has less debt than SIERF: SBWFF (0) vs SIERF (513K). SBWFF (0) and SIERF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SBWFFSIERFSBWFF / SIERF
Capitalization88.8M2.94M3,017%
EBITDA-1.5M-791.89K189%
Gain YTD6.336110.2106%
P/E Ratio12.63N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash51.9M389K13,342%
Total Debt0513K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBWFF vs SIERF: Fundamental Ratings
SBWFF
SIERF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
9089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIERF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SBWFF (76). This means that SIERF’s stock grew similarly to SBWFF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SIERF (100). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew similarly to SIERF’s over the last 12 months.

SIERF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SBWFF (90). This means that SIERF’s stock grew similarly to SBWFF’s over the last 12 months.

SIERF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SBWFF (46). This means that SIERF’s stock grew similarly to SBWFF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SIERF (93). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than SIERF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBWFFSIERF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FPAY1.150.03
+2.68%
FlexShopper
EMR139.761.97
+1.43%
Emerson Electric Co
HGV44.860.39
+0.88%
Hilton Grand Vacations
IMMR8.090.01
+0.12%
Immersion Corp
SHCO7.65-0.07
-0.91%
Soho House & Co

SBWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBWFF and LILIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBWFF and LILIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBWFF
1D Price
Change %
SBWFF100%
N/A
LILIF - SBWFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.50%
SIERF - SBWFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHVLF - SBWFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
SHERF - SBWFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.82%
RTPPF - SBWFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
More

SIERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIERF and NWXPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIERF and NWXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIERF
1D Price
Change %
SIERF100%
N/A
NWXPF - SIERF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLROF - SIERF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHTLF - SIERF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
SBWFF - SIERF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTNTF - SIERF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
More