SBOEF
Price
$30.56
Change
-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
497.14M
SBOEY
Price
$3.03
Change
+$0.06 (+2.02%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
497.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBOEF vs SBOEY

Header iconSBOEF vs SBOEY Comparison
Open Charts SBOEF vs SBOEYBanner chart's image
SBO AG
Price$30.56
Change-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Volume$901
Capitalization497.14M
SBO AG
Price$3.03
Change+$0.06 (+2.02%)
Volume$100
Capitalization497.14M
SBOEF vs SBOEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBOEF vs. SBOEY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBOEF is a Hold and SBOEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SBOEF: $30.56 vs. SBOEY: $3.03)
Brand notoriety: SBOEF and SBOEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBOEF: 141% vs. SBOEY: 64%
Market capitalization -- SBOEF: $497.14M vs. SBOEY: $497.14M
SBOEF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $497.14M. SBOEY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $497.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBOEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBOEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBOEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBOEY is a better buy in the long-term than SBOEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBOEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBOEY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBOEY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBOEY is a better buy in the short-term than SBOEF.

Price Growth

SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -4.95% price change this week, while SBOEY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -9.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.52% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBOEF($497M) and SBOEY($497M) have the same market capitalization . SBOEF (10.49) and SBOEY (10.40) have similar P/E ratio . SBOEY YTD gains are higher at: 7.582 vs. SBOEF (-38.387). SBOEF (102M) and SBOEY (102M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SBOEF (279M) and SBOEY (279M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SBOEF (373M) and SBOEY (373M) have identical debt. SBOEF (526M) and SBOEY (526M) have equivalent revenues.
SBOEFSBOEYSBOEF / SBOEY
Capitalization497M497M100%
EBITDA102M102M100%
Gain YTD-38.3877.582-506%
P/E Ratio10.4910.40101%
Revenue526M526M100%
Total Cash279M279M100%
Total Debt373M373M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBOEF vs SBOEY: Fundamental Ratings
SBOEF
SBOEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9387
SMR RATING
1..100
7575
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
26n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEY (12). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SBOEY’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (93). This means that SBOEY’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEY's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (75). This means that SBOEY’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEY's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (83). This means that SBOEY’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEY's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (52). This means that SBOEY’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBOEFSBOEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGJAX18.350.17
+0.94%
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure A
NAWIX52.440.47
+0.90%
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol I
FCLCX43.650.36
+0.83%
Fidelity Advisor Industrials C
MGLDX16.660.12
+0.73%
MFS Global Real Estate B
PBLAX48.800.21
+0.43%
Principal Blue Chip A

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SBOEY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SBOEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SBOEY - SBOEF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUBCY - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SBFFY - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More

SBOEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEY and SBOEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEY and SBOEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEY
1D Price
Change %
SBOEY100%
N/A
SBOEF - SBOEY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTNR - SBOEY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUBCY - SBOEY
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
TGSGY - SBOEY
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
SAPMY - SBOEY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More