SBNY
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
72.42M
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WF
Price
$57.81
Change
-$0.85 (-1.45%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.18B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBNY vs WF

Header iconSBNY vs WF Comparison
Open Charts SBNY vs WFBanner chart's image
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$0.67
Change+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Volume$720.56K
Capitalization72.42M
Woori Financial Group
Price$57.81
Change-$0.85 (-1.45%)
Volume$200
Capitalization14.18B
SBNY vs WF Comparison Chart in %
SBNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBNY vs. WF commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBNY is a StrongBuy and WF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SBNY: $0.67 vs. WF: $58.66)
Brand notoriety: SBNY and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBNY: 786% vs. WF: 89%
Market capitalization -- SBNY: $72.42M vs. WF: $14.18B
SBNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.42M. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than SBNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBNY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBNY is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

SBNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.77% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

WF is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WF($14.2B) has a higher market cap than SBNY($72.4M). WF has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: WF (6.88) vs SBNY (0.06). WF YTD gains are higher at: 91.411 vs. SBNY (-51.095). SBNY has less debt than WF: SBNY (12.1B) vs WF (80.55T). WF has higher revenues than SBNY: WF (12.85T) vs SBNY (2.7B).
SBNYWFSBNY / WF
Capitalization72.4M14.2B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-51.09591.411-56%
P/E Ratio0.066.881%
Revenue2.7B12.85T0%
Total Cash5.88BN/A-
Total Debt12.1B80.55T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBNY vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
SBNY
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8527
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1001
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9714
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WF (63) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBNYWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIBL66.263.56
+5.68%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Bl 3X ETF
MAKX51.941.68
+3.34%
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
SMLL20.450.32
+1.57%
Harbor Active Small Cap ETF
FIDU82.200.78
+0.96%
Fidelity MSCI Industrials ETF
DBL15.410.09
+0.59%
Doubleline Opportunistic Credit Fund

SBNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBNY has been closely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBNY jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBNY
1D Price
Change %
SBNY100%
+8.06%
WAL - SBNY
84%
Closely correlated
+3.88%
FITB - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
SNV - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
OZK - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BKU - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-1.21%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
-1.59%
KB - WF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
SBNY - WF
44%
Loosely correlated
+8.06%
DBSDY - WF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
MFG - WF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More