SBIG
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.54M
74 days until earnings call
SMSZF
Price
$8.56
Change
+$1.65 (+23.88%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
873.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBIG vs SMSZF

Header iconSBIG vs SMSZF Comparison
Open Charts SBIG vs SMSZFBanner chart's image
SpringBig Holdings
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization1.54M
SMS
Price$8.56
Change+$1.65 (+23.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization873.04M
SBIG vs SMSZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBIG vs. SMSZF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBIG is a Hold and SMSZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SBIG: $0.03 vs. SMSZF: $8.56)
Brand notoriety: SBIG and SMSZF are both not notable
SBIG represents the Packaged Software, while SMSZF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBIG: 3% vs. SMSZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SBIG: $1.54M vs. SMSZF: $873.04M
SBIG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.54M. SMSZF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $873.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBIG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SBIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMSZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMSZF is a better buy in the long-term than SBIG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBIG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SBIG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

SBIG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while SMSZF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBIG is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (-0.49% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMSZF($873M) has a higher market cap than SBIG($1.54M). SBIG YTD gains are higher at: -20.976 vs. SMSZF (-52.072). SMSZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. SBIG (-1.6M). SMSZF has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. SBIG (1.38M). SBIG has less debt than SMSZF: SBIG (9.2M) vs SMSZF (5.44B). SMSZF has higher revenues than SBIG: SMSZF (58.3B) vs SBIG (23.2M).
SBIGSMSZFSBIG / SMSZF
Capitalization1.54M873M0%
EBITDA-1.6M12.6B-0%
Gain YTD-20.976-52.07240%
P/E RatioN/A17.66-
Revenue23.2M58.3B0%
Total Cash1.38M16.6B0%
Total Debt9.2M5.44B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBIGSMSZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKWYX112.010.78
+0.70%
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
JICCX81.150.41
+0.51%
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders C
MLINX9.950.03
+0.30%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
OGICX39.180.05
+0.13%
Invesco Global Opportunities C
PEDGX13.37-0.04
-0.30%
Principal Edge MidCap Institutional

SBIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBIG and CIOXY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBIG and CIOXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBIG
1D Price
Change %
SBIG100%
-7.43%
CIOXY - SBIG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMSZF - SBIG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFPP - SBIG
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZUKI - SBIG
7%
Poorly correlated
-9.96%
ACON - SBIG
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
More

SMSZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMSZF has been loosely correlated with MLNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMSZF jumps, then MLNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSZF
1D Price
Change %
SMSZF100%
N/A
MLNK - SMSZF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
PLUS - SMSZF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
INTA - SMSZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
SBIG - SMSZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.43%
SGGEF - SMSZF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More