Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBHCX vs WCMNX
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts SBHCX vs WCMNX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
Price$13.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.27M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.52
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.57M
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBHCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHCX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHCX has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. WCMNX (47.6M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: SBHCX (0.03) vs WCMNX (0.00). SBHCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: SBHCX (6 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). SBHCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBHCX (40.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHCX: WCMNX (1000) vs SBHCX (2500). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.70 vs. SBHCX (4.65). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.44 vs. WCMNX (-4.85).
| SBHCX | WCMNX | SBHCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 2.04 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.311 | 7.159 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 47.6M | 212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 13.70 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.27 | 28.04 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.44 | -4.85 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement