Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBHCX vs WCMNX
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts SBHCX vs WCMNX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
Price$12.74
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.38M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBHCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHCX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHCX has more cash in the bank: 96.4M vs. WCMNX (43M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: SBHCX (0.20) vs WCMNX (0.00). SBHCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: SBHCX (6 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). SBHCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBHCX (40.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHCX: WCMNX (1000) vs SBHCX (2500). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. SBHCX (-4.79). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.55 vs. WCMNX (11.12).
| SBHCX | WCMNX | SBHCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 2.04 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.595 | 7.092 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.4M | 43M | 224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.79 | 1.42 | -338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.66 | 32.97 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.55 | 11.12 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement