Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBHCX vs WCMNX
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts SBHCX vs WCMNX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
Price$13.25
Change+$0.49 (+3.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.75M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBHCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHCX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHCX has more cash in the bank: 102M vs. WCMNX (47.1M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: SBHCX (0.03) vs WCMNX (0.00). SBHCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: SBHCX (6 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). SBHCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBHCX (40.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHCX: WCMNX (1000) vs SBHCX (2500). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. SBHCX (3.14). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.58 vs. WCMNX (-6.49).
| SBHCX | WCMNX | SBHCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 2.04 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.201 | 6.421 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 102M | 47.1M | 217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 8.34 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.80 | 18.68 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | -6.49 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement