Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBHCX vs WCMLX
SBHCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBHCX vs WCMLX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
Price$13.25
Change+$0.49 (+3.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.75M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
SBHCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBHCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHCX has more cash in the bank: 102M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: SBHCX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). SBHCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBHCX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). SBHCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBHCX (40.00). SBHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: SBHCX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. SBHCX (3.14). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.58 vs. WCMLX (-5.30).
| SBHCX | WCMLX | SBHCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.79 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.201 | 6.395 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 102M | 47.1M | 217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 8.52 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.80 | 19.51 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.58 | -5.30 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |