SBDS
Price
$7.79
Change
+$0.14 (+1.83%)
Updated
Dec 4, 03:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.61M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
W
Price
$94.50
Change
-$0.70 (-0.74%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.41B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBDS vs W

Header iconSBDS vs W Comparison
Open Charts SBDS vs WBanner chart's image
Solo Brands
Price$7.79
Change+$0.14 (+1.83%)
Volume$300
Capitalization12.61M
Wayfair
Price$94.50
Change-$0.70 (-0.74%)
Volume$20.14K
Capitalization12.41B
SBDS vs W Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBDS vs. W commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBDS is a Hold and W is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SBDS: $7.65 vs. W: $95.20)
Brand notoriety: SBDS: Not notable vs. W: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBDS: 149% vs. W: 165%
Market capitalization -- SBDS: $12.61M vs. W: $12.41B
SBDS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $12.61M. W’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $12.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.48T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $52.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SBDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • W’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBDS is a better buy in the long-term than W.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while W’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • W’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBDS is a better buy in the short-term than W.

Price Growth

SBDS (@Internet Retail) experienced а -8.93% price change this week, while W (@Internet Retail) price change was -15.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +123.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

W is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.23% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
W($12.4B) has a higher market cap than SBDS($12.6M). SBDS YTD gains are higher at: 571.053 vs. W (114.801). W has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. SBDS (-166.65M). W has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. SBDS (18.1M). SBDS has less debt than W: SBDS (265M) vs W (3.75B). W has higher revenues than SBDS: W (12B) vs SBDS (407M).
SBDSWSBDS / W
Capitalization12.6M12.4B0%
EBITDA-166.65M124M-134%
Gain YTD571.053114.801497%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue407M12B3%
Total Cash18.1M1.38B1%
Total Debt265M3.75B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
W: Fundamental Ratings
W
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBDSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
W
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIMZ8.030.31
+4.02%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
RDFI23.890.11
+0.46%
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
IBCA26.080.06
+0.23%
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corp ETF
EOD5.870.01
+0.17%
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund
VRIG25.100.02
+0.08%
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grd ETF

SBDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBDS has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBDS jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBDS
1D Price
Change %
SBDS100%
-0.65%
CVNA - SBDS
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.35%
W - SBDS
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.12%
AMZN - SBDS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
RVLV - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
MOGU - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
More