SBCF
Price
$28.76
Change
-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
88 days until earnings call
SFBS
Price
$81.24
Change
-$0.56 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBCF vs SFBS

Header iconSBCF vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts SBCF vs SFBSBanner chart's image
Seacoast Banking
Price$28.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Volume$890.96K
Capitalization2.1B
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$81.24
Change-$0.56 (-0.68%)
Volume$175.28K
Capitalization3.57B
SBCF vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBCF vs. SFBS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBCF is a StrongBuy and SFBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SBCF: $28.76 vs. SFBS: $81.24)
Brand notoriety: SBCF and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBCF: 144% vs. SFBS: 72%
Market capitalization -- SBCF: $2.1B vs. SFBS: $3.57B
SBCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.1B. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

SBCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($3.57B) has a higher market cap than SBCF($2.1B). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than SFBS: SBCF (20.13) vs SFBS (17.31). SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 5.952 vs. SFBS (-2.938). SBCF has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. SFBS (112M). SFBS has less debt than SBCF: SFBS (64.7M) vs SBCF (156M). SBCF has higher revenues than SFBS: SBCF (567M) vs SFBS (427M).
SBCFSFBSSBCF / SFBS
Capitalization2.1B3.57B59%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.952-2.938-203%
P/E Ratio20.1317.31116%
Revenue567M427M133%
Total Cash168M112M150%
Total Debt156M64.7M241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBCF vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
SBCF
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8738
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5943
SMR RATING
1..100
1412
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (63) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (97). This means that SBCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (59). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (14). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (52). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (78). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBCFSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACRNX12.310.14
+1.15%
Columbia Acorn Inst
VQNPX68.450.27
+0.40%
Vanguard Growth & Income Inv
CRFAX12.020.04
+0.33%
Calvert Focused Value A
CDAZX7.76N/A
N/A
Multi-Manager Directional Alt Strat Inst
FCIHX17.49-0.02
-0.11%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
-0.17%
ABCB - SBCF
92%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
TRMK - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
WSFS - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
UCB - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
UBSI - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
-0.68%
ABCB - SFBS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FBK - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
UBSI - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
SBCF - SFBS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
SSB - SFBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More