Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBASX vs WCMLX
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBASX vs WCMLX
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
Price$13.34
Change+$0.49 (+3.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.87M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBASX has more cash in the bank: 102M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). SBASX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: SBASX (0.15) vs WCMLX (0.00). SBASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBASX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than SBASX (1.13). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBASX (40.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBASX: WCMLX (100000) vs SBASX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. SBASX (3.33). SBASX return over 5 years is better than : 3.52 vs. WCMLX (-5.30).
| SBASX | WCMLX | SBASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.235 | 6.395 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 102M | 47.1M | 217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | 8.52 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.31 | 19.51 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.52 | -5.30 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement