Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBASX vs WCMLX
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBASX vs WCMLX
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
Price$13.07
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.67M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.06M
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBASX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBASX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. WCMLX (43.1M). SBASX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: SBASX (0.22) vs WCMLX (0.00). SBASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBASX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than SBASX (1.13). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBASX (40.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBASX: WCMLX (100000) vs SBASX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.98 vs. SBASX (-7.35). SBASX return over 5 years is better than : 18.92 vs. WCMLX (4.74).
| SBASX | WCMLX | SBASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.566 | 6.454 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 43.1M | 227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.35 | -2.98 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.02 | 22.89 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.92 | 4.74 | 399% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement