SB
Price
$5.78
Change
+$1.46 (+33.80%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
591.46M
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFL
Price
$9.04
Change
+$1.86 (+25.91%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SB vs SFL

Header iconSB vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts SB vs SFLBanner chart's image
Safe Bulkers
Price$5.78
Change+$1.46 (+33.80%)
Volume$892.74K
Capitalization591.46M
SFL
Price$9.04
Change+$1.86 (+25.91%)
Volume$1.94M
Capitalization1.2B
SB vs SFL Comparison Chart in %
SB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SB vs. SFL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SB is a Buy and SFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (SB: $5.78 vs. SFL: $9.04)
Brand notoriety: SB and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SB: 163% vs. SFL: 147%
Market capitalization -- SB: $591.46M vs. SFL: $1.2B
SB [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $591.46M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $36.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SB is a better buy in the long-term than SFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SB is a better buy in the short-term than SFL.

Price Growth

SB (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +7.04% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was +8.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

SB is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.81% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.2B) has a higher market cap than SB($591M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than SB: SFL (31.73) vs SB (16.06). SB YTD gains are higher at: 19.917 vs. SFL (15.749). SFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 429M vs. SB (76.8M). SB has less debt than SFL: SB (516M) vs SFL (2.76B). SFL has higher revenues than SB: SFL (773M) vs SB (275M).
SBSFLSB / SFL
Capitalization591M1.2B49%
EBITDA76.8M429M18%
Gain YTD19.91715.749126%
P/E Ratio16.0631.7351%
Revenue275M773M36%
Total Cash120MN/A-
Total Debt516M2.76B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SB vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
SB
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2227
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3252
SMR RATING
1..100
8590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFL's Valuation (5) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SB (25). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to SB’s over the last 12 months.

SB's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (52). This means that SB’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SB's SMR Rating (85) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (90). This means that SB’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (47). This means that SB’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SB's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (5). This means that SB’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDWCX14.830.14
+0.95%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc 529C
QICRX18.050.08
+0.45%
AQR International Multi-Style R6
CTIGX17.810.07
+0.39%
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
SUVAX12.30-0.02
-0.16%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val A
PGBGX38.99-1.29
-3.20%
Principal Blue Chip R5

SB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SB has been closely correlated with SBLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SB jumps, then SBLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SB
1D Price
Change %
SB100%
-1.53%
SBLK - SB
74%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
GNK - SB
72%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
SHIP - SB
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
CMRE - SB
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
HSHP - SB
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
+0.33%
GNK - SFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
SBLK - SFL
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
ASC - SFL
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
SB - SFL
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
CMRE - SFL
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
More