SAXPF
Price
$10.40
Change
-$0.22 (-2.07%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
22.19B
SUND
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAXPF vs SUND

Header iconSAXPF vs SUND Comparison
Open Charts SAXPF vs SUNDBanner chart's image
Sampo OYJ
Price$10.40
Change-$0.22 (-2.07%)
Volume$476
Capitalization22.19B
Sundance Strategies
Price$0.53
Change+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Volume$21.72K
Capitalization15.32M
SAXPF vs SUND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAXPF vs. SUND commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAXPF is a Hold and SUND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (SAXPF: $10.40 vs. SUND: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: SAXPF and SUND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAXPF: 19% vs. SUND: 284%
Market capitalization -- SAXPF: $22.19B vs. SUND: $15.32M
SAXPF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $22.19B. SUND’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $15.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAXPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SAXPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SUND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAXPF is a better buy in the long-term than SUND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAXPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAXPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SUND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAXPF is a better buy in the short-term than SUND.

Price Growth

SAXPF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUND (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +51.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.79% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAXPF($22.2B) has a higher market cap than SUND($15.3M). SAXPF YTD gains are higher at: 22.700 vs. SUND (-17.259). SAXPF has more cash in the bank: 2.31B vs. SUND (3.16K). SUND has less debt than SAXPF: SUND (3.26M) vs SAXPF (3.05B). SAXPF has higher revenues than SUND: SAXPF (10B) vs SUND (0).
SAXPFSUNDSAXPF / SUND
Capitalization22.2B15.3M145,098%
EBITDAN/A-3.04M-
Gain YTD22.700-17.259-132%
P/E Ratio19.31N/A-
Revenue10B0-
Total Cash2.31B3.16K73,210,893%
Total Debt3.05B3.26M93,579%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAXPF vs SUND: Fundamental Ratings
SAXPF
SUND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAXPF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (89). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SAXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (100). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SAXPF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (100). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SUND's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SAXPF (49). This means that SUND’s stock grew similarly to SAXPF’s over the last 12 months.

SAXPF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUND (71). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAXPFSUND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VOR1.060.17
+19.10%
Vor Biopharma
M11.350.23
+2.07%
Macy's
PFLT10.250.02
+0.20%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd
BSBR5.32N/A
N/A
Banco Santander (Brasil) SA
NERV1.76-0.04
-2.22%
Minerva Neurosciences

SAXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAXPF and EQH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAXPF and EQH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAXPF
1D Price
Change %
SAXPF100%
N/A
EQH - SAXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
SAXPY - SAXPF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
NNGPF - SAXPF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNXXF - SAXPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPFRY - SAXPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SUND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUND and SLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUND and SLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUND
1D Price
Change %
SUND100%
+3.92%
SLF - SUND
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
MPFRF - SUND
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAXPY - SUND
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
NNGRY - SUND
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
SAXPF - SUND
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More