SAXPF
Price
$11.43
Change
+$0.17 (+1.51%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
29.98B
SUND
Price
$0.42
Change
+$0.02 (+5.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAXPF vs SUND

Header iconSAXPF vs SUND Comparison
Open Charts SAXPF vs SUNDBanner chart's image
Sampo OYJ
Price$11.43
Change+$0.17 (+1.51%)
Volume$330
Capitalization29.98B
Sundance Strategies
Price$0.42
Change+$0.02 (+5.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization18.24M
SAXPF vs SUND Comparison Chart in %
SAXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAXPF vs. SUND commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAXPF is a Hold and SUND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SAXPF: $11.43 vs. SUND: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: SAXPF and SUND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAXPF: 12% vs. SUND: 12%
Market capitalization -- SAXPF: $29.98B vs. SUND: $18.24M
SAXPF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $29.98B. SUND’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $18.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAXPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SAXPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SUND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAXPF is a better buy in the long-term than SUND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAXPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUND’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAXPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SUND’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAXPF is a better buy in the short-term than SUND.

Price Growth

SAXPF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUND (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +21.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.54% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAXPF($30B) has a higher market cap than SUND($18.2M). SAXPF YTD gains are higher at: 34.751 vs. SUND (-33.862). SAXPF has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. SUND (55.3K). SUND has less debt than SAXPF: SUND (3.59M) vs SAXPF (2.84B). SAXPF has higher revenues than SUND: SAXPF (9.97B) vs SUND (0).
SAXPFSUNDSAXPF / SUND
Capitalization30B18.2M164,835%
EBITDAN/A-1.43M-
Gain YTD34.751-33.862-103%
P/E Ratio22.33N/A-
Revenue9.97B0-
Total Cash1.32B55.3K2,388,788%
Total Debt2.84B3.59M79,025%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAXPF vs SUND: Fundamental Ratings
SAXPF
SUND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9627
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
83100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5092
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAXPF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (91). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SAXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (100). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SAXPF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (100). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SAXPF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUND (92). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SAXPF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUND (66). This means that SAXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAXPFSUND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WS30.380.32
+1.06%
Worthington Steel
BPOPM25.150.05
+0.20%
Popular
CFLT22.43-0.10
-0.44%
Confluent
PYPD3.27-0.08
-2.39%
PolyPid Ltd
LPTH7.44-0.30
-3.88%
LightPath Technologies

SAXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAXPF and ALIZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAXPF and ALIZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAXPF
1D Price
Change %
SAXPF100%
N/A
ALIZF - SAXPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
FIHL - SAXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
SAXPY - SAXPF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
NNGRY - SAXPF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
SUND - SAXPF
14%
Poorly correlated
+5.89%
More

SUND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUND and SAXPF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUND and SAXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUND
1D Price
Change %
SUND100%
+5.89%
SAXPF - SUND
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAXPY - SUND
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
NNGRY - SUND
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
TNXXF - SUND
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWSDF - SUND
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More