Advertisement
SAUHF vs SUVPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAUHF is a Hold and SUVPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAUHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUVPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SAUHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SUVPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAUHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUVPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SAUHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SUVPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SAUHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -1.76% price change this week, while SUVPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.84%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.16% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| SAUHF | SUVPF | SAUHF / SUVPF | |
| Capitalization | 18.5B | 17.9B | 103% |
| EBITDA | 721M | 844M | 85% |
| Gain YTD | -5.706 | 21.877 | -26% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.51 | 119.67 | 29% |
| Revenue | 2.58B | 3.47B | 74% |
| Total Cash | 335M | 872M | 38% |
| Total Debt | 414M | 4.66B | 9% |
SAUHF | SUVPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAUHF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUVPF (77). This means that SAUHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUVPF’s over the last 12 months.
SAUHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SUVPF (100). This means that SAUHF’s stock grew similarly to SUVPF’s over the last 12 months.
SAUHF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SUVPF (86). This means that SAUHF’s stock grew similarly to SUVPF’s over the last 12 months.
SUVPF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SAUHF (72). This means that SUVPF’s stock grew similarly to SAUHF’s over the last 12 months.
SUVPF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SAUHF (90). This means that SUVPF’s stock grew similarly to SAUHF’s over the last 12 months.
| SAUHF | SUVPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 41% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 66% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ONEQ | 92.14 | 0.53 | +0.57% |
| Fidelity Nasdaq Composite ETF | |||
| GROZ | 30.10 | 0.14 | +0.47% |
| Zacks Focus Growth ETF | |||
| KORP | 47.50 | 0.08 | +0.17% |
| American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XHYC | 37.26 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| BondBloxx US HY Cnsmr Cyclcls Sctr ETF | |||
| MSMR | 34.75 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | |||
SAUHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAUHF has been loosely correlated with SAUHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAUHF jumps, then SAUHY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAUHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAUHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SAUHY - SAUHF | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ESLOF - SAUHF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LZAGF - SAUHF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNN - SAUHF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| SGHT - SAUHF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||
SUVPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SUVPF and TLSI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUVPF and TLSI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUVPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUVPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TLSI - SUVPF | 27% Poorly correlated | -8.14% | ||
| IDXX - SUVPF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| SOAGY - SUVPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SAUHF - SUVPF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UEEC - SUVPF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||