Advertisement
SATS vs SONM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SATS is a Hold and SONM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SATS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSONM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SATS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SONM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SATS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SONM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SATS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SONM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SATS (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -8.74% price change this week, while SONM (@Computer Communications) price change was -10.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
SATS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.10% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
@Computer Communications (-0.31% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| SATS | SONM | SATS / SONM | |
| Capitalization | 33.1B | 8.04M | 411,794% |
| EBITDA | -14.16B | -28.34M | 49,972% |
| Gain YTD | 5.630 | 71.429 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 15.2B | 59.1M | 25,719% |
| Total Cash | 3.92B | 2.14M | 183,201% |
| Total Debt | 30.6B | 5.07M | 603,908% |
SATS | SONM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SONM's Valuation (44) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SATS (85). This means that SONM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SATS’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for SONM (100). This means that SATS’s stock grew significantly faster than SONM’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's SMR Rating (99) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SONM (100). This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to SONM’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SONM (48). This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to SONM’s over the last 12 months.
SONM's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as SATS (27). This means that SONM’s stock grew similarly to SATS’s over the last 12 months.
| SATS | SONM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
SATS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SATS and LITE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SATS and LITE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SATS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATS | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| LITE - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
| EXTR - SATS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| GILT - SATS | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.36% | ||
| CRDO - SATS | 30% Poorly correlated | -7.21% | ||
| BDC - SATS | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
More | ||||
SONM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SONM and PRGS have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SONM and PRGS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SONM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONM | 100% | -5.10% | ||
| PRGS - SONM | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
| AEVA - SONM | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
| SATS - SONM | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| ARQQ - SONM | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
| PDYN - SONM | 23% Poorly correlated | +15.84% | ||
More | ||||