SASR
Price
$31.62
Change
-$1.37 (-4.15%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1B
52 days until earnings call
SCZC
Price
$40.53
Change
+$0.34 (+0.85%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
221.19M
Ad is loading...

SASR vs SCZC

Header iconSASR vs SCZC Comparison
Open Charts SASR vs SCZCBanner chart's image
Sandy Spring Ban
Price$31.62
Change-$1.37 (-4.15%)
Volume$213.81K
Capitalization1B
West Coast Community Ban
Price$40.53
Change+$0.34 (+0.85%)
Volume$4.64K
Capitalization221.19M
SASR vs SCZC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SASR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SASR vs. SCZC commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SASR is a Hold and SCZC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (SASR: $31.62 vs. SCZC: $40.53)
Brand notoriety: SASR and SCZC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SASR: 86% vs. SCZC: 63%
Market capitalization -- SASR: $1B vs. SCZC: $221.19M
SASR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1B. SCZC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $221.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SASR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCZC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SASR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCZC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCZC is a better buy in the long-term than SASR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SASR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SASR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SASR (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.03% price change this week, while SCZC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

SASR is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.06% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SASR($1B) has a higher market cap than SCZC($221M). SASR has higher P/E ratio than SCZC: SASR (8.15) vs SCZC (6.49). SCZC YTD gains are higher at: -2.223 vs. SASR (-5.275). SASR has more cash in the bank: 80.3M vs. SCZC (37M). SCZC has less debt than SASR: SCZC (0) vs SASR (921M). SASR has higher revenues than SCZC: SASR (419M) vs SCZC (80.3M).
SASRSCZCSASR / SCZC
Capitalization1B221M452%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.275-2.223237%
P/E Ratio8.156.49126%
Revenue419M80.3M522%
Total Cash80.3M37M217%
Total Debt921M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SASR vs SCZC: Fundamental Ratings
SASR
SCZC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8319
SMR RATING
1..100
1631
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SASR's Valuation (79) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SCZC (85) in the null industry. This means that SASR’s stock grew similarly to SCZC’s over the last 12 months.

SCZC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SASR (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SCZC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SASR’s over the last 12 months.

SASR's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SCZC (31) in the null industry. This means that SASR’s stock grew similarly to SCZC’s over the last 12 months.

SCZC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SASR (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SCZC’s stock grew similarly to SASR’s over the last 12 months.

SASR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SCZC (16) in the null industry. This means that SASR’s stock grew similarly to SCZC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SASR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SASR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

SASR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SASR has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SASR jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SASR
1D Price
Change %
SASR100%
-4.15%
SFNC - SASR
86%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
UBSI - SASR
86%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
AUB - SASR
86%
Closely correlated
-4.08%
TOWN - SASR
85%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
SBCF - SASR
85%
Closely correlated
-3.33%
More

SCZC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCZC and MBLU have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCZC and MBLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCZC
1D Price
Change %
SCZC100%
+0.85%
MBLU - SCZC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SASR - SCZC
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.15%
LWCL - SCZC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FITB - SCZC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
STBA - SCZC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More