SAPMY
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.09 (-16.36%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
SBOEF
Price
$33.47
Change
-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
970.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAPMY vs SBOEF

Header iconSAPMY vs SBOEF Comparison
Open Charts SAPMY vs SBOEFBanner chart's image
Saipem S.p.A
Price$0.46
Change-$0.09 (-16.36%)
Volume$191
Capitalization1.18B
Schoeller Bleckmann Oilfield Equipment AG
Price$33.47
Change-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Volume$800
Capitalization970.02M
SAPMY vs SBOEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAPMY vs. SBOEF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAPMY is a Hold and SBOEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SAPMY: $0.46 vs. SBOEF: $33.47)
Brand notoriety: SAPMY and SBOEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAPMY: 1% vs. SBOEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SAPMY: $1.18B vs. SBOEF: $970.02M
SAPMY [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.18B. SBOEF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $970.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAPMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBOEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SAPMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBOEF is a better buy in the long-term than SAPMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAPMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBOEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAPMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBOEF is a better buy in the short-term than SAPMY.

Price Growth

SAPMY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -15.84% price change this week, while SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.14% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPMY($1.18B) has a higher market cap than SBOEF($970M). SAPMY YTD gains are higher at: 5.779 vs. SBOEF (-32.520). SBOEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 144M vs. SAPMY (-254M). SAPMY has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. SBOEF (302M). SBOEF has less debt than SAPMY: SBOEF (271M) vs SAPMY (3.74B). SAPMY has higher revenues than SBOEF: SAPMY (6.87B) vs SBOEF (548M).
SAPMYSBOEFSAPMY / SBOEF
Capitalization1.18B970M122%
EBITDA-254M144M-176%
Gain YTD5.779-32.520-18%
P/E RatioN/A9.69-
Revenue6.87B548M1,253%
Total Cash1.5B302M495%
Total Debt3.74B271M1,379%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAPMY vs SBOEF: Fundamental Ratings
SAPMY
SBOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9743
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4983
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9565
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (24). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (100). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAPMY (97). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SAPMY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (83). This means that SAPMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (95). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAPMYSBOEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGOZX20.100.24
+1.21%
Alger Small Cap Focus Z
PAULX43.760.37
+0.85%
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core Adv
CSPYX20.820.13
+0.63%
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst3
STMOX35.410.09
+0.25%
Sterling Capital Real Estate C
JERTX12.08N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate T

SAPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPMY and CFWFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPMY and CFWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPMY
1D Price
Change %
SAPMY100%
N/A
CFWFF - SAPMY
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
CESDF - SAPMY
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
SUBCY - SAPMY
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
TGSGY - SAPMY
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
POFCY - SAPMY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SBOEY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SBOEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SBOEY - SBOEF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
SUBCY - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SBFFY - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More