SAPLF
Price
$0.97
Change
-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
345.68M
VINS
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAPLF vs VINS

Header iconSAPLF vs VINS Comparison
Open Charts SAPLF vs VINSBanner chart's image
Sylvania Platinum
Price$0.97
Change-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Volume$7.05K
Capitalization345.68M
Vindicator Silver Lead Mining
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
SAPLF vs VINS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAPLF vs. VINS commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAPLF is a Hold and VINS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (SAPLF: $0.98 vs. VINS: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: SAPLF and VINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAPLF: 30% vs. VINS: 23%
Market capitalization -- SAPLF: $345.68M vs. VINS: $0
SAPLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $345.68M. VINS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAPLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SAPLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPLF is a better buy in the long-term than VINS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAPLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAPLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VINS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINS is a better buy in the short-term than SAPLF.

Price Growth

SAPLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.06% price change this week, while VINS (@Precious Metals) price change was +81.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VINS YTD gains are higher at: 89.125 vs. SAPLF (80.556).
SAPLFVINSSAPLF / VINS
Capitalization346MN/A-
EBITDA84.5MN/A-
Gain YTD80.55689.12590%
P/E Ratio6.47N/A-
Revenue152MN/A-
Total Cash94.1MN/A-
Total Debt84KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAPLF vs VINS: Fundamental Ratings
SAPLF
VINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
81100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAPLF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as VINS (21). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew similarly to VINS’s over the last 12 months.

SAPLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as VINS (100). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew similarly to VINS’s over the last 12 months.

SAPLF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as VINS (100). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew similarly to VINS’s over the last 12 months.

VINS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPLF (37). This means that VINS’s stock grew similarly to SAPLF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPLF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VINS (100). This means that SAPLF’s stock grew significantly faster than VINS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAPLFVINS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIMD0.500.02
+3.69%
Ainos
ICUI131.821.14
+0.87%
ICU Medical
BALY10.000.04
+0.40%
Bally's Corporation
NWS33.87-0.09
-0.27%
News Corp
MPU0.80-0.16
-17.05%
Mega Matrix Inc

SAPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPLF and ELKMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPLF and ELKMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPLF
1D Price
Change %
SAPLF100%
-1.52%
ELKMF - SAPLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPTF - SAPLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.91%
STPGF - SAPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
FFOXF - SAPLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
REDLF - SAPLF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VINS and WEXPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VINS and WEXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINS
1D Price
Change %
VINS100%
N/A
WEXPF - VINS
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.39%
RVTI - VINS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNR - VINS
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
REDLF - VINS
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPLF - VINS
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More